Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Infrastructure Monitoring

Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring vs Netdata

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring #3 in Infrastructure Monitoring 9.2/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 2 of 3 features Visit Datadog
Netdata #7 in Infrastructure Monitoring 8.8/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 2 of 3 features Visit Netdata

Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring leads on 0 checks, Netdata on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreDatadog Infrastructure Monitoring · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialboth

Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring scores higher on our rubric for infrastructure monitoring: 9.2 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

On os coverage, Netdata gives you Multiple where Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring offers Linux and windows.

Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring is the better fit for cloud-native teams needing observability breadth. Netdata is the better fit for low-cost, real-time infrastructure visibility.

  • Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring fits best

    Cloud-native teams needing observability breadth

  • Netdata fits best

    Low-cost, real-time infrastructure visibility

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Netdata 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.8
Ranking #3 in Infrastructure Monitoring #7 in Infrastructure Monitoring
Best for Cloud-native teams needing observability breadth Low-cost, real-time infrastructure visibility
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $15/unit/mo $4.50/unit/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days 14 days
Free trial length 14 days 14 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop, Mobile
Platforms Web, Windows, Linux, macOS Web, Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android
Integrations 1,000+ integrations 850+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring 2/3 · Netdata 2/3
VM monitoring ✓ ✓
Service monitoring ✓ ✓
Agentless monitoring Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Included hosts Not checked yet Not checked yet
Metrics retention Not checked yet Custom
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
OS coverage Linux and windows Multiple
Our review
Pros
  • More than 1,000 integrations across cloud and observability tools
  • Correlates metrics, traces, logs, and security signals
  • Maps hosts and containers with tag-based infrastructure search
  • Per-second metrics with zero-configuration discovery and automated dashboards
  • Monitors VMs, containers, logs, SNMP devices, and network flows
  • Business adds unlimited retention, RBAC, SSO, SCIM, and Netdata AI
Cons
  • Paid plans use host-based pricing
  • The Free plan retains metrics for only 1 day
  • Monitoring requires the Datadog Agent rather than agentless collection
  • Community supports up to 5 active connected nodes
  • Business pricing uses annual billing and per-node charges
  • Enterprise On-Premise starts at 200 node licenses
Our verdict

Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring is a cloud-based service for development, IT operations, and security teams monitoring servers, virtual machines, containers, processes, system services, and cloud infrastructure. It collects metrics and…

Read the review →

Netdata is a distributed observability platform for operations teams, system administrators, DevOps engineers, and SREs. It collects infrastructure metrics at one-second resolution and covers logs, applications, services, virtual machines,…

Read the review →
  1. Datadog Infrastructure MonitoringInfrastructure Monitoring 9.2Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. NetdataInfrastructure Monitoring 8.8Free plan · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring — where it wins

    • More than 1,000 integrations across cloud and observability tools
    • Correlates metrics, traces, logs, and security signals
    • Maps hosts and containers with tag-based infrastructure search

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid plans use host-based pricing
    • The Free plan retains metrics for only 1 day
    • Monitoring requires the Datadog Agent rather than agentless collection
  • Netdata — where it wins

    • Per-second metrics with zero-configuration discovery and automated dashboards
    • Monitors VMs, containers, logs, SNMP devices, and network flows
    • Business adds unlimited retention, RBAC, SSO, SCIM, and Netdata AI

    Where it doesn't

    • Community supports up to 5 active connected nodes
    • Business pricing uses annual billing and per-node charges
    • Enterprise On-Premise starts at 200 node licenses
  • Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring9.2/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    Broad infrastructure observability for cloud-native teams, with host-based pricing.

    Visit DatadogFull verdict →
  • Netdata8.8/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A low-cost observability platform with per-second metrics and broad infrastructure coverage.

    Visit NetdataFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update