Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Infrastructure Monitoring

Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring vs Icinga

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring #3 in Infrastructure Monitoring 9.2/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 2 of 3 features Visit Datadog
Icinga #8 in Infrastructure Monitoring 8.7/10 Free plan · 60-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Icinga

Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring leads on 0 checks, Icinga on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreDatadog Infrastructure Monitoring · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialboth
  • Most featuresIcinga · 3 of 3

Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring scores higher on our rubric for infrastructure monitoring: 9.2 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.

On deployment model, Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring gives you Hybrid where Icinga offers Self-hosted. On os coverage, Icinga gives you Multiple where Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring offers Linux and windows.

Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring is the better fit for cloud-native teams needing observability breadth. Icinga is the better fit for open-source teams needing flexible checks.

  • Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring fits best

    Cloud-native teams needing observability breadth

  • Icinga fits best

    Open-source teams needing flexible checks

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Icinga 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.7
Ranking #3 in Infrastructure Monitoring #8 in Infrastructure Monitoring
Best for Cloud-native teams needing observability breadth Open-source teams needing flexible checks
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $15/unit/mo —
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days 60 days
Free trial length 14 days 60 days
Deployment Cloud Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, Linux, macOS Web, Linux, Windows
Integrations 1,000+ integrations 10 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring 2/3 · Icinga 3/3
VM monitoring ✓ ✓
Service monitoring ✓ ✓
Agentless monitoring Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Included hosts Not checked yet Not checked yet
Metrics retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment model Hybrid Self-hosted
OS coverage Linux and windows Multiple
Our review
Pros
  • More than 1,000 integrations across cloud and observability tools
  • Correlates metrics, traces, logs, and security signals
  • Maps hosts and containers with tag-based infrastructure search
  • Unlimited hosts and services in the Forever Free Edition
  • Agent-based and agentless monitoring across Linux and Windows
  • Broad integrations, custom checks, plugins, and REST API automation
Cons
  • Paid plans use host-based pricing
  • The Free plan retains metrics for only 1 day
  • Monitoring requires the Datadog Agent rather than agentless collection
  • Self-hosted deployment adds operational responsibility
  • Exclusive enterprise modules require a Module Subscription
  • The platform is primarily deployed on Linux
Our verdict

Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring is a cloud-based service for development, IT operations, and security teams monitoring servers, virtual machines, containers, processes, system services, and cloud infrastructure. It collects metrics and…

Read the review →

Icinga is an open-source infrastructure monitoring system for IT teams managing servers, networks, applications, cloud resources, containers, and virtualized environments. It supports host and service availability checks, server and…

Read the review →
  1. Datadog Infrastructure MonitoringInfrastructure Monitoring 9.2Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. IcingaInfrastructure Monitoring 8.7Free plan · 60-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring — where it wins

    • More than 1,000 integrations across cloud and observability tools
    • Correlates metrics, traces, logs, and security signals
    • Maps hosts and containers with tag-based infrastructure search

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid plans use host-based pricing
    • The Free plan retains metrics for only 1 day
    • Monitoring requires the Datadog Agent rather than agentless collection
  • Icinga — where it wins

    • Unlimited hosts and services in the Forever Free Edition
    • Agent-based and agentless monitoring across Linux and Windows
    • Broad integrations, custom checks, plugins, and REST API automation

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment adds operational responsibility
    • Exclusive enterprise modules require a Module Subscription
    • The platform is primarily deployed on Linux
  • Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring9.2/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    Broad infrastructure observability for cloud-native teams, with host-based pricing.

    Visit DatadogFull verdict →
  • Icinga8.7/10 · Free plan · 60-day trial

    A flexible, broad monitoring system for teams comfortable managing self-hosted infrastructure.

    Visit IcingaFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update