Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · End-to-End Testing Software

Cypress vs mabl

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Cypress #4 in End-to-End Testing Software 9.0/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Cypress
mabl #12 in End-to-End Testing Software 8.2/10 Pricing on request · 14-day trial Free trial✓ 3 of 3 features Visit mabl

Cypress leads on 1 check, mabl on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCypress · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly Cypress
  • Free trialboth

Cypress scores higher on our rubric for end-to-end testing software: 9.0 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #12.

Cypress offers free plan; mabl doesn't. On test authoring, mabl gives you Low_code where Cypress offers Code.

Cypress is the better fit for javaScript teams needing web E2E and CI. mabl is the better fit for teams wanting AI-assisted low-code testing.

  • Cypress fits best

    JavaScript teams needing web E2E and CI

  • mabl fits best

    Teams wanting AI-assisted low-code testing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Cypress 9.0/10 Visit ↗ mabl 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.2
Ranking #4 in End-to-End Testing Software #12 in End-to-End Testing Software
Best for JavaScript teams needing web E2E and CI Teams wanting AI-assisted low-code testing
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $799/yr Pricing on request · 14-day trial
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial 30 days 14 days
Free trial length 30 days 14 days
Deployment Cloud, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Email, Live chat, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, GDPR, SSO/SAML SSO/SAML
Integrations 6 integrations 14 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Cypress 3/3 · mabl 3/3
Self-hosted runner ✓ ✓
Mobile web testing ✓ ✓
Visual testing ✓ ✓
Specs
Test authoring Code Low_code
Browser support Multi_engine Multi_engine
Parallel runs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Open-source end-to-end and component testing for web applications
  • Runs across Chromium browsers, Firefox, and WebKit
  • Supports CI parallelization, API testing, and visual integrations
  • Low-code, point-and-click, and natural-language test authoring
  • Web, mobile, API, visual, accessibility, and performance testing
  • Self-hosted CI Runner, local execution, and broad integrations
Cons
  • Cloud recording and collaboration features require a paid plan
  • Visual comparison requires plugins or integrations
  • The lowest paid tier has no stated parallel-run maximum
  • No free plan is available
  • Pricing uses contact-sales rather than named paid tiers
  • Mobile app testing is limited to supported Android and iOS devices
Our verdict

Cypress is an open-source JavaScript and TypeScript testing framework for developers and QA teams building web applications. Its Cypress App runs end-to-end and component tests on Windows, macOS, Linux, and self-hosted infrastructure.…

Read the review →

mabl is an AI-assisted test automation platform for software development and quality teams. It supports end-to-end coverage for browser-based web applications, mobile applications, APIs, accessibility, performance, visual behavior, email,…

Read the review →
  1. CypressEnd-to-End Testing Software 9.0Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. mablEnd-to-End Testing Software 8.2Pricing on request · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Cypress — where it wins

    • Open-source end-to-end and component testing for web applications
    • Runs across Chromium browsers, Firefox, and WebKit
    • Supports CI parallelization, API testing, and visual integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Cloud recording and collaboration features require a paid plan
    • Visual comparison requires plugins or integrations
    • The lowest paid tier has no stated parallel-run maximum

  • mabl — where it wins

    • Low-code, point-and-click, and natural-language test authoring
    • Web, mobile, API, visual, accessibility, and performance testing
    • Self-hosted CI Runner, local execution, and broad integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • Pricing uses contact-sales rather than named paid tiers
    • Mobile app testing is limited to supported Android and iOS devices
  • Cypress9.0/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A flexible JavaScript testing framework with free local execution and paid CI collaboration features.

    Visit CypressFull verdict →
  • mabl8.2/10 · Pricing on request · 14-day trial

    AI-assisted low-code coverage across web, mobile, and APIs with flexible execution.

    Visit mablFull verdict →

More comparisons

All End-to-End testing software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update