Head-to-head · Threat Modeling Software
CYMETRIS vs ThreatZ
CYMETRIS leads on 1 check, ThreatZ on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreCYMETRIS · 7.7/10
CYMETRIS scores higher on our rubric for threat modeling software: 7.7 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.
CYMETRIS leads on project limit: 5 projects versus 3 projects.
CYMETRIS is the better fit for automotive teams running ISO/SAE 21434 TARA. ThreatZ is the better fit for automotive enterprises needing full assurance workflows.
- CYMETRIS fits best
Automotive teams running ISO/SAE 21434 TARA
- ThreatZ fits best
Automotive enterprises needing full assurance workflows
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | CYMETRIS 7.7/10 Visit ↗ | ThreatZ 6.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.7 | 6.9 |
| Ranking | #5 in Threat Modeling Software | #8 in Threat Modeling Software |
| Best for | Automotive teams running ISO/SAE 21434 TARA | Automotive enterprises needing full assurance workflows |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Tickets, Docs | |
| Compliance | GDPR | GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA |
| Integrations | 6 integrations | 30+ integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features CYMETRIS 4/4 · ThreatZ 4/4 | ||
| Attack-path analysis | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk prioritization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Collaborative review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates and frameworks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Project limit | 5 projects (best) | 3 projects |
| Modeling methods | Multiple | Multiple |
| Deployment | Both | Both |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | CYMETRIS is a threat modeling and cyber risk analysis platform for security engineers, product security teams, and cybersecurity consultants. Its strongest fit is automotive product security, where guided Threat Analysis and Risk… Read the review → |
ThreatZ is an automotive cybersecurity engineering platform for OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers. It brings system and vehicle architecture modeling, TARA, attack-path analysis, risk assessment, SBOM management, vulnerability monitoring, security… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
CYMETRIS — where it wins
- Guided ISO/SAE 21434 TARA workflow with automatic logic checks
- Interactive attack-path modeling linked to architecture components
- Lifecycle versioning, vulnerability linkage, and collaborative review
Where it doesn't
- CYMETRIS Lite allows up to five active projects
- No free plan is available
- Lite support is ticket-based rather than priority support with an SLA
ThreatZ — where it wins
- Combines TARA, attack paths, risk assessment, SBOM and compliance work products
- Connects with Jira, GitHub, DOORS, Polarion, CodeQL and vulnerability databases
- Supports hosted private cloud, on-premise and air-gapped deployments
Where it doesn't
- Team is limited to three projects
- No free plan is available
- Professional pricing is charged per user per month
- CYMETRIS7.7/10 · From €99/mo
A focused TARA platform for automotive teams managing ISO/SAE 21434 risk.
Visit CYMETRISFull verdict → - ThreatZ6.9/10 · From $1,199/mo (annual)
A broad automotive threat modeling suite for enterprises managing assurance across complex programs.
Visit ThreatZFull verdict →
More comparisons
- CAIRIS vs CYMETRIS
- CAIRIS vs ThreatZ
- IriusRisk vs CYMETRIS
- IriusRisk vs ThreatZ
- ThreatOpus vs CYMETRIS
- ThreatOpus vs ThreatZ
- ThreatModeler Nexus vs CYMETRIS
- ThreatModeler Nexus vs ThreatZ
All threat modeling software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




