Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · CI Failure Analysis And Flaky Test Tools

Currents vs Flakiness.io

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Currents #7 in CI Failure Analysis And Flaky Test Tools 7.9/10 14-day trial Free trial✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Currents
Flakiness.io #8 in CI Failure Analysis And Flaky Test Tools 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Flakiness.io

Currents leads on 0 checks, Flakiness.io on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planonly Flakiness.io
  • Free trialonly Currents

Currents and Flakiness.io score identically on our rubric (7.9 out of 10) for ci failure analysis and flaky test tools; Currents sits at #7 and Flakiness.io at #8 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

Flakiness.io offers free plan; Currents doesn't.

Currents is the better fit for playwright teams wanting rich failure artifacts. Flakiness.io is the better fit for teams needing self-hosted flake analytics and artifacts.

  • Currents fits best

    Playwright teams wanting rich failure artifacts

  • Flakiness.io fits best

    Teams needing self-hosted flake analytics and artifacts

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Currents 7.9/10 Visit ↗ Flakiness.io 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.9
Ranking #7 in CI Failure Analysis And Flaky Test Tools #8 in CI Failure Analysis And Flaky Test Tools
Best for Playwright teams wanting rich failure artifacts Teams needing self-hosted flake analytics and artifacts
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $49/mo $49/mo
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Live chat, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 14 integrations 13 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Currents 1/4 · Flakiness.io 1/4
Flaky test detection ✓ ✓
Failure root-cause analysis Not checked yet Not checked yet
AI fix suggestions Not checked yet Not checked yet
Test quarantine Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
CI integrations Not checked yet Not checked yet
Failure history Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Traces, screenshots, videos, logs, and artifacts support detailed failure analysis
  • Flaky-test detection, quarantine actions, and trend analytics organize CI health
  • Cloud, API, and self-hosted deployment fit varied engineering environments
  • Commit- and environment-aware regression and flake classification
  • Logs, screenshots, videos, traces, and HTML artifact viewers
  • Self-hosting, shard balancing, APIs, and AI-agent workflows
Cons
  • No free plan; monthly pricing starts at $49
  • Scale is limited to 10K test results per month and 50 users
  • Evidence depth is centered on Playwright despite broader framework support
  • Support is limited to email and documentation
  • Connector coverage centers on listed GitHub, GitLab, and test frameworks
  • Self-hosted deployment places hosting and maintenance on your team
Our verdict

Currents is a cloud-based test analytics dashboard, reporter, and CI test orchestrator built around Playwright, with support for Cypress, WebdriverIO, Jest, Vitest, Node.js Test Runner, and JUnit-compatible frameworks. It is aimed at…

Read the review →

Flakiness.io is a test analytics service for engineering teams working with GitHub or GitLab. It links test results to commits and environments to distinguish regressions from flaky failures, then presents history, execution trends,…

Read the review →
  1. CurrentsCI Failure Analysis And Flaky Test Tools 7.914-day trial
  2. Flakiness.ioCI Failure Analysis And Flaky Test Tools 7.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Currents — where it wins

    • Traces, screenshots, videos, logs, and artifacts support detailed failure analysis
    • Flaky-test detection, quarantine actions, and trend analytics organize CI health
    • Cloud, API, and self-hosted deployment fit varied engineering environments

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; monthly pricing starts at $49
    • Scale is limited to 10K test results per month and 50 users
    • Evidence depth is centered on Playwright despite broader framework support

  • Flakiness.io — where it wins

    • Commit- and environment-aware regression and flake classification
    • Logs, screenshots, videos, traces, and HTML artifact viewers
    • Self-hosting, shard balancing, APIs, and AI-agent workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Support is limited to email and documentation
    • Connector coverage centers on listed GitHub, GitLab, and test frameworks
    • Self-hosted deployment places hosting and maintenance on your team

Currents vs Flakiness.io: questions

Which is better for CI failure analysis and flaky test tools, Currents or Flakiness.io?

Currents and Flakiness.io score identically on our rubric (7.9 out of 10) for ci failure analysis and flaky test tools; Currents sits at #7 and Flakiness.io at #8 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

How do Currents and Flakiness.io compare?

Of the 3 checks we put side by side, Currents leads on none, Flakiness.io on 1, and 2 are level. Free plan only on Flakiness.io.

Do Currents and Flakiness.io have a free plan?

Currents: No. Flakiness.io: Yes.

More comparisons

All CI failure analysis and flaky test tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update