Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Backend as a Service (BaaS) Software

Convex vs CloudKit

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Convex #3 in Backend as a Service (BaaS) Software 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit Convex

Convex leads on 1 check, CloudKit on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreConvex · 8.7/10
  • Free planonly Convex
  • Most featuresConvex · 2 of 4

Convex scores higher on our rubric for backend as a service (baas) software: 8.7 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

Convex offers free plan; CloudKit doesn't.

Convex is the better fit for realtime TypeScript application teams. CloudKit is the better fit for apple-platform apps needing synchronized cloud data.

  • Convex fits best

    Realtime TypeScript application teams

  • CloudKit fits best

    Apple-platform apps needing synchronized cloud data

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Convex 8.7/10 Visit ↗ CloudKit 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 7.9
Ranking #3 in Backend as a Service (BaaS) Software #7 in Backend as a Service (BaaS) Software
Best for Realtime TypeScript application teams Apple-platform apps needing synchronized cloud data
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price — $99/yr
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web Web, iOS, macOS
Support Email, Community, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 10 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Convex 2/4 · CloudKit 0/4
Managed authentication Not checked yet Not checked yet
Serverless functions ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Realtime data updates Not checked yet Not checked yet
File storage ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Database type Not checked yet Not checked yet
API styles Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Reactive database with realtime client subscriptions
  • TypeScript backend functions, scheduled actions, and HTTP APIs
  • Cloud or self-hosted deployment with integrated storage and search
  • Public, private, and shared databases with bidirectional synchronization
  • CloudKit Console includes schemas, telemetry, logs, and alerts
  • Conflict detection supports client, server, and ancestor record versions
Cons
  • Professional pricing starts at $25 per developer monthly
  • Business & Enterprise requires a $2,500 monthly minimum
  • Starter usage beyond free limits is pay as you go
  • Requires a $99 annual Apple Developer Program membership
  • Offline support is minimal and relies on network connectivity
  • Backend scope is narrower outside Apple-focused applications
Our verdict

Convex is a backend platform for dynamic applications, aimed at teams building realtime TypeScript products. Developers define queries, mutations, serverless actions, and scheduled functions in TypeScript, then access them through…

Read the review →

CloudKit is Apple’s cloud data service for applications that need structured storage and synchronization across Apple platforms and the web. It supports public, private, and shared database areas inside iCloud containers, with record-based…

Read the review →
  1. ConvexBackend as a Service (BaaS) Software 8.7Free plan
  2. CloudKitBackend as a Service (BaaS) Software 7.9Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Convex — where it wins

    • Reactive database with realtime client subscriptions
    • TypeScript backend functions, scheduled actions, and HTTP APIs
    • Cloud or self-hosted deployment with integrated storage and search

    Where it doesn't

    • Professional pricing starts at $25 per developer monthly
    • Business & Enterprise requires a $2,500 monthly minimum
    • Starter usage beyond free limits is pay as you go
  • CloudKit — where it wins

    • Public, private, and shared databases with bidirectional synchronization
    • CloudKit Console includes schemas, telemetry, logs, and alerts
    • Conflict detection supports client, server, and ancestor record versions

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires a $99 annual Apple Developer Program membership
    • Offline support is minimal and relies on network connectivity
    • Backend scope is narrower outside Apple-focused applications
  • Convex8.7/10 · Free plan

    A TypeScript-first reactive backend with realtime data, storage, search, and scheduled logic.

    Visit ConvexFull verdict →
  • CloudKit7.9/10 · Paid

    A deeply integrated Apple backend for synchronized app data, with a narrower scope and paid membership.

    Visit CloudKitFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update