Confirm vs EZO EAM

Confirm7.4Visit EZO EAM6.6Visit

Higher score Confirm #4 in EAM Software 7.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Siemens

vs

EZO EAM #7 in EAM Software 6.6/10 15-day trial ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit EZO EAM

• Confirm fits best

  Organizations prioritizing GIS-led field asset management

• EZO EAM fits best

  Teams managing assets across locations and on mobile

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Confirm 7.4/10 Visit ↗	EZO EAM 6.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	7.4	6.6
Ranking	#4 in EAM Software	#7 in EAM Software
Best for	Organizations prioritizing GIS-led field asset management	Teams managing assets across locations and on mobile
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	Not published	Not published
Free plan	Not published	—
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud, Mobile	Cloud, Mobile
Platforms	Web, iOS, Android	Web, iOS, Android
Built for	Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Confirm 3/4 · EZO EAM 4/4
Work order management	✓	✓
Preventive maintenance	✓	✓
Condition monitoring	Not published	✓ (best)
Spare parts inventory	✓	✓
Specs
Mobile access	Ios_android	Ios_android
Asset hierarchy levels	Not published	Not published
Our review
Pros	Native GIS connects asset mapping with work scheduling and allocation. Configurable records track condition, criticality, cost, and worth. Resident requests, contractor coordination, and mobile field workflows are supported.	Tracks assets, checkouts, reservations, and inventory across locations Schedules preventive maintenance by time, usage, or condition Supports mobile workflows, barcode and QR scanning, and work orders
Cons	Pricing requires contacting Siemens rather than choosing a published plan. Its focus is government infrastructure and public works teams. Predictive and integration capabilities are less deep than higher-ranked suites.	No free plan; the trial lasts 15 days Full CMMS features are an add-on or included with Enterprise Plan features and CMMS access vary by tier
Our verdict	Confirm brings asset records, mapping, maintenance, and field work together for government infrastructure and public works teams. Siemens positions it for organizations managing networks such as city assets, roads, bridges, and parks. Its… Read the review →	EZO EAM brings asset records, check-in and checkout, reservations, inventory, and maintenance workflows into a system for organizations managing equipment across teams and locations. Its web and iOS and Android access supports mobile asset… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Confirm — where it wins

  • Native GIS connects asset mapping with work scheduling and allocation.
  • Configurable records track condition, criticality, cost, and worth.
  • Resident requests, contractor coordination, and mobile field workflows are supported.

  Where it doesn't

  • Pricing requires contacting Siemens rather than choosing a published plan.
  • Its focus is government infrastructure and public works teams.
  • Predictive and integration capabilities are less deep than higher-ranked suites.

• EZO EAM — where it wins

  • Tracks assets, checkouts, reservations, and inventory across locations
  • Schedules preventive maintenance by time, usage, or condition
  • Supports mobile workflows, barcode and QR scanning, and work orders

  Where it doesn't

  • No free plan; the trial lasts 15 days
  • Full CMMS features are an add-on or included with Enterprise
  • Plan features and CMMS access vary by tier

• Confirm7.4/10 · Pricing on request

  GIS-led asset management for public works, maintenance, and field coordination.

  Visit SiemensFull verdict →
• EZO EAM6.6/10 · 15-day trial

  Mobile asset tracking and maintenance workflows, with CMMS depth tied to higher tiers.

  Visit EZO EAMFull verdict →