Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Graph Database Hosting

CognoDB vs FalkorDB

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score CognoDB #5 in Graph Database Hosting 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 3 features Visit CognoDB
FalkorDB #7 in Graph Database Hosting 8.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 3 features Visit FalkorDB

CognoDB leads on 0 checks, FalkorDB on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCognoDB · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresCognoDB · 2 of 3

CognoDB scores higher on our rubric for graph database hosting: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

FalkorDB offers vector search; CognoDB doesn't.

CognoDB is the better fit for budget-conscious Cypher-compatible deployments. FalkorDB is the better fit for open-source graph and GraphRAG projects.

  • CognoDB fits best

    Budget-conscious Cypher-compatible deployments

  • FalkorDB fits best

    Open-source graph and GraphRAG projects

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature CognoDB 8.8/10 Visit ↗ FalkorDB 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.6
Ranking #5 in Graph Database Hosting #7 in Graph Database Hosting
Best for Budget-conscious Cypher-compatible deployments Open-source graph and GraphRAG projects
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $9/unit/mo $73/GB/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Linux
Support Email, Docs Community, Docs
Compliance SSO/SAML SOC 2
Integrations 21+ integrations 7 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features CognoDB 2/3 · FalkorDB 1/3
High availability ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Automated backups ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Vector search — ✓ (best)
Specs
Supported engines CognoDB graph engine Not checked yet
Query languages Cypher OpenCypher (Cypher)
Deployment scope Single-region Not checked yet
Storage limit 2 GB Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Free plan includes Cypher, Neo4j drivers, backups and Terraform
  • Imports data from warehouses, streams, object storage and table formats
  • Supports traversal, BM25 full-text search and MCP-based queries
  • OpenCypher, graph algorithms, and multiple indexing options
  • GraphRAG SDK supports hybrid retrieval and cited answers
  • Docker, Kubernetes, cloud, and seven official client libraries
Cons
  • Instances run in a single selected region
  • Vector search is not supported
  • Dedicated hosting starts at $241 per instance per month
  • OpenCypher extensions may reduce query portability
  • Deployment options require architecture decisions
  • Broad capabilities may exceed simple graph workloads
Our verdict

CognoDB is a managed cloud graph database for applications built around nodes, relationships and traversals. It is aimed at teams that want Cypher over Bolt 5.0–5.4, compatibility with official Neo4j drivers, and provisioned instances…

Read the review →

FalkorDB is a Redis-based property graph database for developers and teams working with interconnected data. It supports nodes, relationships, labels, properties, OpenCypher queries, graph traversals, full-text indexing, range indexing,…

Read the review →
  1. CognoDBGraph Database Hosting 8.8Free plan
  2. FalkorDBGraph Database Hosting 8.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • CognoDB — where it wins

    • Free plan includes Cypher, Neo4j drivers, backups and Terraform
    • Imports data from warehouses, streams, object storage and table formats
    • Supports traversal, BM25 full-text search and MCP-based queries

    Where it doesn't

    • Instances run in a single selected region
    • Vector search is not supported
    • Dedicated hosting starts at $241 per instance per month
  • FalkorDB — where it wins

    • OpenCypher, graph algorithms, and multiple indexing options
    • GraphRAG SDK supports hybrid retrieval and cited answers
    • Docker, Kubernetes, cloud, and seven official client libraries

    Where it doesn't

    • OpenCypher extensions may reduce query portability
    • Deployment options require architecture decisions
    • Broad capabilities may exceed simple graph workloads

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update