Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Graph Database Hosting

Neo4j vs CognoDB

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Neo4j #1 in Graph Database Hosting 9.4/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Neo4j
CognoDB #5 in Graph Database Hosting 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 3 features Visit CognoDB

Neo4j leads on 1 check, CognoDB on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreNeo4j · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Neo4j
  • Most featuresCognoDB · 2 of 3

Neo4j scores higher on our rubric for graph database hosting: 9.4 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #5.

Neo4j offers vector search; CognoDB doesn't.

Neo4j is the better fit for teams needing a mature, full-featured graph platform. CognoDB is the better fit for budget-conscious Cypher-compatible deployments.

  • Neo4j fits best

    Teams needing a mature, full-featured graph platform

  • CognoDB fits best

    Budget-conscious Cypher-compatible deployments

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Neo4j 9.4/10 Visit ↗ CognoDB 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.8
Ranking #1 in Graph Database Hosting #5 in Graph Database Hosting
Best for Teams needing a mature, full-featured graph platform Budget-conscious Cypher-compatible deployments
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — $9/unit/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Tickets, Live chat, Community, Docs Email, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA SSO/SAML
Integrations 10 integrations 21+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Neo4j 1/3 · CognoDB 2/3
High availability Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Automated backups Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Vector search ✓ (best) —
Specs
Supported engines Not checked yet CognoDB graph engine
Query languages Cypher, GQL Cypher
Deployment scope Not checked yet Single-region
Storage limit Not checked yet 2 GB
Our review
Pros
  • Native property graphs with Cypher and full ACID transaction support
  • Graph algorithms, vector indexes, and machine-learning pipelines
  • Managed cloud, self-managed, hybrid, and major cloud deployment options
  • Free plan includes Cypher, Neo4j drivers, backups and Terraform
  • Imports data from warehouses, streams, object storage and table formats
  • Supports traversal, BM25 full-text search and MCP-based queries
Cons
  • Paid AuraDB pricing starts at $65 per GB per month
  • Business Critical requires a minimum 2GB cluster
  • Virtual Dedicated Cloud pricing requires contact with sales
  • Instances run in a single selected region
  • Vector search is not supported
  • Dedicated hosting starts at $241 per instance per month
Our verdict

Neo4j is a native graph database for developers, data scientists, and organizations working with connected data. It stores nodes, relationships, and properties, with applications spanning analytics, recommendations, fraud detection,…

Read the review →

CognoDB is a managed cloud graph database for applications built around nodes, relationships and traversals. It is aimed at teams that want Cypher over Bolt 5.0–5.4, compatibility with official Neo4j drivers, and provisioned instances…

Read the review →
  1. Neo4jGraph Database Hosting 9.4Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. CognoDBGraph Database Hosting 8.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Neo4j — where it wins

    • Native property graphs with Cypher and full ACID transaction support
    • Graph algorithms, vector indexes, and machine-learning pipelines
    • Managed cloud, self-managed, hybrid, and major cloud deployment options

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid AuraDB pricing starts at $65 per GB per month
    • Business Critical requires a minimum 2GB cluster
    • Virtual Dedicated Cloud pricing requires contact with sales
  • CognoDB — where it wins

    • Free plan includes Cypher, Neo4j drivers, backups and Terraform
    • Imports data from warehouses, streams, object storage and table formats
    • Supports traversal, BM25 full-text search and MCP-based queries

    Where it doesn't

    • Instances run in a single selected region
    • Vector search is not supported
    • Dedicated hosting starts at $241 per instance per month
  • Neo4j9.4/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A mature graph platform with Cypher, transactions, algorithms, vector indexes, and flexible deployment.

    Visit Neo4jFull verdict →
  • CognoDB8.8/10 · Free plan

    A low-cost Cypher-compatible host with practical automation and single-region deployment.

    Visit CognoDBFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update