Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Linters

clang-tidy vs Credo

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score clang-tidy #5 in Linters 8.7/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit LLVM Project
Credo #7 in Linters 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Credo

clang-tidy leads on 1 check, Credo on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreclang-tidy · 8.7/10
  • Free planonly Credo
  • Most featuresclang-tidy · 4 of 4

clang-tidy scores higher on our rubric for linters: 8.7 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

clang-tidy leads on languages supported: 3 versus 1.

clang-tidy is the better fit for C++ teams needing bug and style analysis. Credo is the better fit for elixir teams checking style and complexity.

  • clang-tidy fits best

    C++ teams needing bug and style analysis

  • Credo fits best

    Elixir teams checking style and complexity

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature clang-tidy 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Credo 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.5
Ranking #5 in Linters #7 in Linters
Best for C++ teams needing bug and style analysis Elixir teams checking style and complexity
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Open source Free plan
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Support Community, Docs Docs
Integrations 8 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features clang-tidy 4/4 · Credo 3/4
Autofix ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Custom rules ✓ ✓
Security rules ✓ ✓
CI support ✓ ✓
Specs
Languages supported 3 (best) 1
IDE support Ide Ide
Our review
Pros
  • Covers style, interface misuse, bugs, performance, portability, and maintainability.
  • Supports autofix, custom query checks, CUDA analysis, and changed-line workflows.
  • Integrates with clangd, CLion, Visual Studio, Qt Creator, and other IDEs.
  • Covers mistakes, style, refactoring, and complexity findings
  • Supports strict mode, explanations, JSON, and SARIF output
  • Offers custom checks, plugins, and broad editor integrations
Cons
  • Its main focus is C++ and Clang-based code analysis.
  • Autofix applies only to checks with supported fixes.
  • Configuration spans command-line globs, .clang-tidy files, and compilation databases.
  • Supports Elixir rather than multiple programming languages
  • Installation and use center on Mix and the command line
  • Teams may need another tool for broader language coverage
Our verdict

clang-tidy is an open-source, Clang-based linter for C++ teams that want more than basic style checking. It diagnoses style violations, interface misuse, statically detectable bugs, performance issues, portability problems, and…

Read the review →

Credo is an open-source static code analysis tool for Elixir projects. It is aimed at developers and teams that want consistent style, maintainable code, and earlier feedback on common mistakes. Its checks cover naming, coding style,…

Read the review →
  1. clang-tidyLinters 8.7Open source
  2. CredoLinters 8.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • clang-tidy — where it wins

    • Covers style, interface misuse, bugs, performance, portability, and maintainability.
    • Supports autofix, custom query checks, CUDA analysis, and changed-line workflows.
    • Integrates with clangd, CLion, Visual Studio, Qt Creator, and other IDEs.

    Where it doesn't

    • Its main focus is C++ and Clang-based code analysis.
    • Autofix applies only to checks with supported fixes.
    • Configuration spans command-line globs, .clang-tidy files, and compilation databases.
  • Credo — where it wins

    • Covers mistakes, style, refactoring, and complexity findings
    • Supports strict mode, explanations, JSON, and SARIF output
    • Offers custom checks, plugins, and broad editor integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports Elixir rather than multiple programming languages
    • Installation and use center on Mix and the command line
    • Teams may need another tool for broader language coverage

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update