Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Zero Trust Network Access Software

Check Point SASE Private Access vs Forcepoint ZTNA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Check Point SASE Private Access #5 in Zero Trust Network Access Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Visit Check Point
Forcepoint ZTNA #7 in Zero Trust Network Access Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Forcepoint

Check Point SASE Private Access leads on 0 checks, Forcepoint ZTNA on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCheck Point SASE Private Access · 8.8/10
  • Most featuresCheck Point SASE Private Access · 2 of 3

Check Point SASE Private Access scores higher on our rubric for zero trust network access software: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

On access methods, Forcepoint ZTNA gives you Both where Check Point SASE Private Access offers Browser.

Check Point SASE Private Access is the better fit for browser-centric enterprises needing session controls. Forcepoint ZTNA is the better fit for teams prioritizing private-app data protection.

  • Check Point SASE Private Access fits best

    Browser-centric enterprises needing session controls

  • Forcepoint ZTNA fits best

    Teams prioritizing private-app data protection

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Check Point SASE Private Access 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Forcepoint ZTNA 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.6
Ranking #5 in Zero Trust Network Access Software #7 in Zero Trust Network Access Software
Best for Browser-centric enterprises needing session controls Teams prioritizing private-app data protection
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS
Support Phone, Tickets · 24/7 Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Check Point SASE Private Access 2/3 · Forcepoint ZTNA 1/3
Device posture checks ✓ ✓
SIEM log export Not checked yet Not checked yet
Session recording ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Access methods Browser Both
Private app connectors Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported app protocols HTTP/S, RDP, SSH SSH, RDP, HTTP, HTTPS, SMB, SFTP
Our review
Pros
  • Continuous device posture checks and application-level access policies
  • Agentless browser access for unmanaged devices
  • Session recording, data isolation, and copy/paste restrictions
  • Agentless web and agent-based non-web application access
  • Contextual policies use user, device, location, and behavior signals
  • DLP, malware scanning, MFA escalation, and unified reporting
Cons
  • Web is the only listed platform
  • Pricing uses a contact-sales model
  • No integrations are listed
  • Non-web agent access is described for managed Windows and macOS devices
  • Deployment requires connectors in private environments
  • Pricing uses a contact-sales model
Our verdict

Check Point SASE Private Access provides identity-centric, application-level access to on-premises and cloud resources. It is designed for enterprises, remote workforces, third parties, and branch offices that need browser-based access…

Read the review →

Forcepoint ZTNA provides controlled remote access to private applications hosted in internal data centers and private clouds. It is designed for organizations that need to protect private-application data while supporting both…

Read the review →
  1. Check Point SASE Private AccessZero Trust Network Access Software 8.8Pricing on request
  2. Forcepoint ZTNAZero Trust Network Access Software 8.6Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Check Point SASE Private Access — where it wins

    • Continuous device posture checks and application-level access policies
    • Agentless browser access for unmanaged devices
    • Session recording, data isolation, and copy/paste restrictions

    Where it doesn't

    • Web is the only listed platform
    • Pricing uses a contact-sales model
    • No integrations are listed
  • Forcepoint ZTNA — where it wins

    • Agentless web and agent-based non-web application access
    • Contextual policies use user, device, location, and behavior signals
    • DLP, malware scanning, MFA escalation, and unified reporting

    Where it doesn't

    • Non-web agent access is described for managed Windows and macOS devices
    • Deployment requires connectors in private environments
    • Pricing uses a contact-sales model
  • Check Point SASE Private Access8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A browser-centric zero trust access service with strong session and posture controls.

    Visit Check PointFull verdict →
  • Forcepoint ZTNA8.6/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused ZTNA option for protecting private-app data with contextual controls.

    Visit ForcepointFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update