Head-to-head · Zero Trust Network Access Software
Check Point SASE Private Access vs Forcepoint ZTNA
Check Point SASE Private Access leads on 0 checks, Forcepoint ZTNA on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreCheck Point SASE Private Access · 8.8/10
- Most featuresCheck Point SASE Private Access · 2 of 3
Check Point SASE Private Access scores higher on our rubric for zero trust network access software: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.
On access methods, Forcepoint ZTNA gives you Both where Check Point SASE Private Access offers Browser.
Check Point SASE Private Access is the better fit for browser-centric enterprises needing session controls. Forcepoint ZTNA is the better fit for teams prioritizing private-app data protection.
- Check Point SASE Private Access fits best
Browser-centric enterprises needing session controls
- Forcepoint ZTNA fits best
Teams prioritizing private-app data protection
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Check Point SASE Private Access 8.8/10 Visit ↗ | Forcepoint ZTNA 8.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Ranking | #5 in Zero Trust Network Access Software | #7 in Zero Trust Network Access Software |
| Best for | Browser-centric enterprises needing session controls | Teams prioritizing private-app data protection |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Pricing on request | Pricing on request |
| Free plan | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, macOS |
| Support | Phone, Tickets · 24/7 | Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs |
| Built for | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Check Point SASE Private Access 2/3 · Forcepoint ZTNA 1/3 | ||
| Device posture checks | ✓ | ✓ |
| SIEM log export | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Session recording | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Access methods | Browser | Both |
| Private app connectors | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Supported app protocols | HTTP/S, RDP, SSH | SSH, RDP, HTTP, HTTPS, SMB, SFTP |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Check Point SASE Private Access provides identity-centric, application-level access to on-premises and cloud resources. It is designed for enterprises, remote workforces, third parties, and branch offices that need browser-based access… Read the review → |
Forcepoint ZTNA provides controlled remote access to private applications hosted in internal data centers and private clouds. It is designed for organizations that need to protect private-application data while supporting both… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Check Point SASE Private Access — where it wins
- Continuous device posture checks and application-level access policies
- Agentless browser access for unmanaged devices
- Session recording, data isolation, and copy/paste restrictions
Where it doesn't
- Web is the only listed platform
- Pricing uses a contact-sales model
- No integrations are listed
Forcepoint ZTNA — where it wins
- Agentless web and agent-based non-web application access
- Contextual policies use user, device, location, and behavior signals
- DLP, malware scanning, MFA escalation, and unified reporting
Where it doesn't
- Non-web agent access is described for managed Windows and macOS devices
- Deployment requires connectors in private environments
- Pricing uses a contact-sales model
- Check Point SASE Private Access8.8/10 · Pricing on request
A browser-centric zero trust access service with strong session and posture controls.
Visit Check PointFull verdict → - Forcepoint ZTNA8.6/10 · Pricing on request
A focused ZTNA option for protecting private-app data with contextual controls.
Visit ForcepointFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Cloudflare Access vs Check Point SASE Private Access
- Cloudflare Access vs Forcepoint ZTNA
- Zscaler Private Access vs Check Point SASE Private Access
- Zscaler Private Access vs Forcepoint ZTNA
- Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Check Point SASE Private Access
- Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Forcepoint ZTNA
- AWS Verified Access vs Check Point SASE Private Access
- AWS Verified Access vs Forcepoint ZTNA
All zero trust network access software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





