Head-to-head · Literature Review Software
CADIMA vs INRA
CADIMA leads on 0 checks, INRA on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreCADIMA · 9.0/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresCADIMA · 5 of 5
CADIMA scores higher on our rubric for literature review software: 9.0 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.
CADIMA is the better fit for teams wanting a free structured review platform. INRA is the better fit for AI-assisted reviews with source verification.
- CADIMA fits best
Teams wanting a free structured review platform
- INRA fits best
AI-assisted reviews with source verification
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | CADIMA 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | INRA 8.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Ranking | #4 in Literature Review Software | #7 in Literature Review Software |
| Best for | Teams wanting a free structured review platform | AI-assisted reviews with source verification |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Free | $7.50/seat/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Community, Docs | |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Enterprise |
| Features CADIMA 5/5 · INRA 1/5 | ||
| Screening workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full-text management | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Systematic review tools | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Collaboration | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Evidence mapping | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Discovery tools | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Citation import limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | CADIMA is a free, hosted web application for conducting and documenting systematic reviews, systematic maps and other literature reviews. It is aimed at research teams that need a shared workflow for organizing references, screening… Read the review → |
INRA is a web-based AI-assisted research platform for researchers, graduate students, clinical teams, policy groups, and R&D teams. It supports academic search, source retrieval, uploaded PDFs, reference-manager sources, evidence… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
CADIMA — where it wins
- Free access to systematic reviews, maps and literature reviews
- Covers screening, appraisal, extraction and duplicate removal
- Supports team roles, permissions and conflict management
Where it doesn't
- Web-only access limits platform choice
- No paid tiers for expanded capabilities
- Published site version is dated April 2023
INRA — where it wins
- Citation-backed reviews with inline source inspection
- Full systematic review workflow, including screening and extraction
- Zotero, Mendeley, PubMed, OpenAlex, and other source integrations
Where it doesn't
- Web-only access
- Teams & Institutions requires at least three seats
- AI assistance does not replace reviewer inclusion and judgment decisions
- CADIMA9.0/10 · Free plan
A free, structured workspace for collaborative literature reviews.
Visit CADIMAFull verdict → - INRA8.7/10 · Free plan
A broad review workflow with citation inspection, screening, extraction, and PRISMA outputs.
Visit INRAFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Buhos vs CADIMA
- Buhos vs INRA
- Rayyan vs CADIMA
- Rayyan vs INRA
- PICO Portal vs CADIMA
- PICO Portal vs INRA
- CADIMA vs Elicit
- CADIMA vs ASReview
All literature review software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





