Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Literature Review Software

CADIMA vs INRA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score CADIMA #4 in Literature Review Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit CADIMA
INRA #7 in Literature Review Software 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 5 features Visit INRA

CADIMA leads on 0 checks, INRA on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCADIMA · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresCADIMA · 5 of 5

CADIMA scores higher on our rubric for literature review software: 9.0 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

CADIMA is the better fit for teams wanting a free structured review platform. INRA is the better fit for AI-assisted reviews with source verification.

  • CADIMA fits best

    Teams wanting a free structured review platform

  • INRA fits best

    AI-assisted reviews with source verification

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature CADIMA 9.0/10 Visit ↗ INRA 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.7
Ranking #4 in Literature Review Software #7 in Literature Review Software
Best for Teams wanting a free structured review platform AI-assisted reviews with source verification
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Free $7.50/seat/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Email
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Enterprise
Features CADIMA 5/5 · INRA 1/5
Screening workflow ✓ ✓
Full-text management ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Systematic review tools ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Collaboration ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Evidence mapping ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Discovery tools Not checked yet Not checked yet
Citation import limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Free access to systematic reviews, maps and literature reviews
  • Covers screening, appraisal, extraction and duplicate removal
  • Supports team roles, permissions and conflict management
  • Citation-backed reviews with inline source inspection
  • Full systematic review workflow, including screening and extraction
  • Zotero, Mendeley, PubMed, OpenAlex, and other source integrations
Cons
  • Web-only access limits platform choice
  • No paid tiers for expanded capabilities
  • Published site version is dated April 2023
  • Web-only access
  • Teams & Institutions requires at least three seats
  • AI assistance does not replace reviewer inclusion and judgment decisions
Our verdict

CADIMA is a free, hosted web application for conducting and documenting systematic reviews, systematic maps and other literature reviews. It is aimed at research teams that need a shared workflow for organizing references, screening…

Read the review →

INRA is a web-based AI-assisted research platform for researchers, graduate students, clinical teams, policy groups, and R&D teams. It supports academic search, source retrieval, uploaded PDFs, reference-manager sources, evidence…

Read the review →
  1. CADIMALiterature Review Software 9.0Free plan
  2. INRALiterature Review Software 8.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • CADIMA — where it wins

    • Free access to systematic reviews, maps and literature reviews
    • Covers screening, appraisal, extraction and duplicate removal
    • Supports team roles, permissions and conflict management

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-only access limits platform choice
    • No paid tiers for expanded capabilities
    • Published site version is dated April 2023
  • INRA — where it wins

    • Citation-backed reviews with inline source inspection
    • Full systematic review workflow, including screening and extraction
    • Zotero, Mendeley, PubMed, OpenAlex, and other source integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-only access
    • Teams & Institutions requires at least three seats
    • AI assistance does not replace reviewer inclusion and judgment decisions

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update