Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Wiki Software

BlueSpice vs MediaWiki

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score BlueSpice #3 in Wiki Software 9.0/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 5 features Visit BlueSpice
MediaWiki #4 in Wiki Software 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 5 features Visit MediaWiki

BlueSpice leads on 0 checks, MediaWiki on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBlueSpice · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly BlueSpice

BlueSpice scores higher on our rubric for wiki software: 9.0 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

BlueSpice is the better fit for enterprise teams needing a governed wiki. MediaWiki is the better fit for large communities building extensible wikis.

  • BlueSpice fits best

    Enterprise teams needing a governed wiki

  • MediaWiki fits best

    Large communities building extensible wikis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature BlueSpice 9.0/10 Visit ↗ MediaWiki 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.9
Ranking #3 in Wiki Software #4 in Wiki Software
Best for Enterprise teams needing a governed wiki Large communities building extensible wikis
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price €4.50/user/mo Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Tickets, Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features BlueSpice 3/5 · MediaWiki 3/5
Version history ✓ ✓
SSO support ✓ ✓
API access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Custom domain ✓ ✓
Self-hosting Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Page permissions Not checked yet Not checked yet
Page limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Workflows, approvals, versioning, permissions, and read confirmations
  • Cloud, API, and self-hosted deployment options
  • Integrations with Teams, Slack, Jira, GitHub, and identity providers
  • Collaborative editing with revisions, diffs, and page reversion
  • Extensions, APIs, permissions, and namespaces support customization
  • Multilingual content and analytics suit broad knowledge projects
Cons
  • The free edition provides community support rather than professional support
  • The €4.50 entry price is tied to annual billing
  • Some advanced capabilities are reserved for paid editions
  • Self-hosting requires PHP, a web server, and a supported database
  • Analytics and SSO are provided through extensions rather than universal core features
  • Teams seeking vendor-hosted pricing plans should consider another option
Our verdict

BlueSpice is open-source wiki and knowledge-base software based on MediaWiki. It is designed for companies, public authorities, and organizations building internal knowledge bases, public wikis, documentation systems, intranets, or…

Read the review →

MediaWiki is free, open-source wiki software for creating collaborative knowledge bases, documentation sites, encyclopedias, and private or public wikis. It fits large communities, organizations, and technical teams that need control over…

Read the review →
  1. BlueSpiceWiki Software 9.0Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. MediaWikiWiki Software 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • BlueSpice — where it wins

    • Workflows, approvals, versioning, permissions, and read confirmations
    • Cloud, API, and self-hosted deployment options
    • Integrations with Teams, Slack, Jira, GitHub, and identity providers

    Where it doesn't

    • The free edition provides community support rather than professional support
    • The €4.50 entry price is tied to annual billing
    • Some advanced capabilities are reserved for paid editions
  • MediaWiki — where it wins

    • Collaborative editing with revisions, diffs, and page reversion
    • Extensions, APIs, permissions, and namespaces support customization
    • Multilingual content and analytics suit broad knowledge projects

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosting requires PHP, a web server, and a supported database
    • Analytics and SSO are provided through extensions rather than universal core features
    • Teams seeking vendor-hosted pricing plans should consider another option
  • BlueSpice9.0/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A governed wiki with collaborative editing, workflows, analytics, AI, and self-hosting.

    Visit BlueSpiceFull verdict →
  • MediaWiki8.9/10 · Free plan

    A flexible, self-hosted wiki for communities and organizations building extensive knowledge bases.

    Visit MediaWikiFull verdict →

BlueSpice vs MediaWiki: questions

Which is better for wiki software, BlueSpice or MediaWiki?

BlueSpice scores higher on our rubric for wiki software: 9.0 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

How do BlueSpice and MediaWiki compare?

All 4 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do BlueSpice and MediaWiki have a free plan?

BlueSpice: Yes. MediaWiki: Yes.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update