Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · ETL Testing Tools

BiG EVAL vs Informatica Data Validation

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score BiG EVAL #4 in ETL Testing Tools 8.4/10 From $89/mo · 14-day free trial ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit BiG EVAL
Informatica Data Validation #5 in ETL Testing Tools 8.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Informatica

BiG EVAL leads on 0 checks, Informatica Data Validation on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBiG EVAL · 8.4/10

BiG EVAL scores higher on our rubric for etl testing tools: 8.4 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

BiG EVAL is the better fit for mid-size teams that want configurable ETL testing without enterprise-tier pricing. Informatica Data Validation is the better fit for enterprises validating existing Informatica PowerCenter ETL workflows.

  • BiG EVAL fits best

    Mid-size teams that want configurable ETL testing without enterprise-tier pricing

  • Informatica Data Validation fits best

    Enterprises validating existing Informatica PowerCenter ETL workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature BiG EVAL 8.4/10 Visit ↗ Informatica Data Validation 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.4 8.2
Ranking #4 in ETL Testing Tools #5 in ETL Testing Tools
Best for Mid-size teams that want configurable ETL testing without enterprise-tier pricing Enterprises validating existing Informatica PowerCenter ETL workflows
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $89/mo Pricing on request
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Features BiG EVAL 3/4 · Informatica Data Validation 3/4
Source-to-target reconciliation ✓ ✓
No-code test authoring — —
CI/CD integration ✓ ✓
API access ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Our review
Pros
  • Published entry price ($89/mo) is rare in this category and makes budgeting simple
  • Framework is built to be customized to a team's own testing conventions rather than one fixed workflow
  • 14-day trial lets a team validate real pipelines before committing
  • Deep, native fit with PowerCenter metadata and workflows rather than a bolt-on connector
  • Backed by Informatica's long enterprise support and services organization
  • Suited to regulated environments already standardized on the Informatica stack
Cons
  • Smaller public track record than the longer-established enterprise players in this list
  • Customization is a strength but means more setup work than a fully opinionated out-of-the-box tool
  • Less name recognition can mean a harder internal "why this vendor" conversation
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation, typical for this tier but still opaque upfront
  • Real value is narrower outside a PowerCenter-centric estate than the other tools on this list
  • Implementations for a first rollout commonly run months, not days
Our verdict

BiG EVAL's standout feature in a category full of "contact us" pricing is that it actually publishes a number: plans start at $89 a month, with a 14-day trial to test it against a real pipeline first. For a mid-size team trying to get ETL…

Read the review →

Informatica Data Validation makes the most sense as a "yes, and" purchase for a team that already runs PowerCenter: it reads the same metadata and workflows natively rather than treating Informatica as just another connector to configure,…

Read the review →
  1. BiG EVALETL Testing Tools 8.4From $89/mo · 14-day free trial
  2. Informatica Data ValidationETL Testing Tools 8.2Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • BiG EVAL — where it wins

    • Published entry price ($89/mo) is rare in this category and makes budgeting simple
    • Framework is built to be customized to a team's own testing conventions rather than one fixed workflow
    • 14-day trial lets a team validate real pipelines before committing

    Where it doesn't

    • Smaller public track record than the longer-established enterprise players in this list
    • Customization is a strength but means more setup work than a fully opinionated out-of-the-box tool
    • Less name recognition can mean a harder internal "why this vendor" conversation
  • Informatica Data Validation — where it wins

    • Deep, native fit with PowerCenter metadata and workflows rather than a bolt-on connector
    • Backed by Informatica's long enterprise support and services organization
    • Suited to regulated environments already standardized on the Informatica stack

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales conversation, typical for this tier but still opaque upfront
    • Real value is narrower outside a PowerCenter-centric estate than the other tools on this list
    • Implementations for a first rollout commonly run months, not days
  • BiG EVAL8.4/10 · From $89/mo · 14-day free trial

    A flexible ETL testing framework with one of the lowest published entry prices in this category.

    Visit BiG EVALFull verdict →
  • Informatica Data Validation8.2/10 · Pricing on request

    The default choice for shops already standardized on Informatica PowerCenter who need matching validation.

    Visit InformaticaFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update