Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · ETL Testing Tools

BiG EVAL vs Great Expectations

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score BiG EVAL #4 in ETL Testing Tools 8.4/10 From $89/mo · 14-day free trial ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit BiG EVAL
Great Expectations #7 in ETL Testing Tools 7.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit Great Expectations

BiG EVAL leads on 1 check, Great Expectations on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBiG EVAL · 8.4/10
  • Free planonly Great Expectations
  • Most featuresBiG EVAL · 3 of 4

BiG EVAL scores higher on our rubric for etl testing tools: 8.4 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

Great Expectations offers free plan; BiG EVAL doesn't. BiG EVAL offers source-to-target reconciliation; Great Expectations doesn't. On deployment model, BiG EVAL gives you Hybrid where Great Expectations offers Self-hosted.

BiG EVAL is the better fit for mid-size teams that want configurable ETL testing without enterprise-tier pricing. Great Expectations is the better fit for engineering teams that want validation defined and versioned as code, for free.

  • BiG EVAL fits best

    Mid-size teams that want configurable ETL testing without enterprise-tier pricing

  • Great Expectations fits best

    Engineering teams that want validation defined and versioned as code, for free

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature BiG EVAL 8.4/10 Visit ↗ Great Expectations 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.4 7.8
Ranking #4 in ETL Testing Tools #7 in ETL Testing Tools
Best for Mid-size teams that want configurable ETL testing without enterprise-tier pricing Engineering teams that want validation defined and versioned as code, for free
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $89/mo Free plan
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Features BiG EVAL 3/4 · Great Expectations 2/4
Source-to-target reconciliation ✓ (best) —
No-code test authoring — —
CI/CD integration ✓ ✓
API access ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Self-hosted
Our review
Pros
  • Published entry price ($89/mo) is rare in this category and makes budgeting simple
  • Framework is built to be customized to a team's own testing conventions rather than one fixed workflow
  • 14-day trial lets a team validate real pipelines before committing
  • No licensing cost for the open-source core, and it's widely used so answers are easy to find
  • Its validation assertions read as plain English and double as documentation of what the data should look like
  • Integrates into most Python-based pipelines (Airflow, dbt, pandas, Spark) without a proprietary agent
Cons
  • Smaller public track record than the longer-established enterprise players in this list
  • Customization is a strength but means more setup work than a fully opinionated out-of-the-box tool
  • Less name recognition can mean a harder internal "why this vendor" conversation
  • No GUI for non-engineers; writing and maintaining expectations assumes comfort with Python
  • Self-hosting means your own team owns scaling, uptime, and upgrades
  • GX Cloud (the hosted option) is a separate product with its own evaluation, not just "the paid tier"
Our verdict

BiG EVAL's standout feature in a category full of "contact us" pricing is that it actually publishes a number: plans start at $89 a month, with a 14-day trial to test it against a real pipeline first. For a mid-size team trying to get ETL…

Read the review →

Great Expectations is the tool we'd point a Python-comfortable data engineering team to when the budget line for ETL testing is zero but the standards still need to be real. "Expectations" are declared as code, which means they're…

Read the review →
  1. BiG EVALETL Testing Tools 8.4From $89/mo · 14-day free trial
  2. Great ExpectationsETL Testing Tools 7.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • BiG EVAL — where it wins

    • Published entry price ($89/mo) is rare in this category and makes budgeting simple
    • Framework is built to be customized to a team's own testing conventions rather than one fixed workflow
    • 14-day trial lets a team validate real pipelines before committing

    Where it doesn't

    • Smaller public track record than the longer-established enterprise players in this list
    • Customization is a strength but means more setup work than a fully opinionated out-of-the-box tool
    • Less name recognition can mean a harder internal "why this vendor" conversation
  • Great Expectations — where it wins

    • No licensing cost for the open-source core, and it's widely used so answers are easy to find
    • Its validation assertions read as plain English and double as documentation of what the data should look like
    • Integrates into most Python-based pipelines (Airflow, dbt, pandas, Spark) without a proprietary agent

    Where it doesn't

    • No GUI for non-engineers; writing and maintaining expectations assumes comfort with Python
    • Self-hosting means your own team owns scaling, uptime, and upgrades
    • GX Cloud (the hosted option) is a separate product with its own evaluation, not just "the paid tier"

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update