Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Disaster Recovery Software

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Zerto

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Zerto #6 in Disaster Recovery Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request · 14-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Zerto

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery leads on 0 checks, Zerto on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAWS Elastic Disaster Recovery · 9.0/10
  • Free trialonly Zerto
  • Most featuresAWS Elastic Disaster Recovery · 3 of 4

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery scores higher on our rubric for disaster recovery software: 9.0 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is the better fit for AWS-centric teams with transparent hourly pricing. Zerto is the better fit for multi-cloud teams needing near-synchronous recovery.

  • AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery fits best

    AWS-centric teams with transparent hourly pricing

  • Zerto fits best

    Multi-cloud teams needing near-synchronous recovery

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Zerto 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.9
Ranking #4 in Disaster Recovery Software #6 in Disaster Recovery Software
Best for AWS-centric teams with transparent hourly pricing Multi-cloud teams needing near-synchronous recovery
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $0.03/unit usage-based Pricing on request · 14-day trial
Free plan — —
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, Linux Web
Support Docs Tickets, Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2 GDPR
Integrations 7 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery 3/4 · Zerto 0/4
Failover orchestration — Not checked yet
Failback orchestration ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Test failover ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Recovery runbooks ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Not checked yet
Supported workloads physical servers, VMware vSphere, Microsoft Hyper-V, Amazon EC2, other cloud infrastructure, Windows and Linux applications, Oracle, MySQL, SQL Server, SAP Not checked yet
RPO target Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Continuous block-level replication with point-in-time recovery
  • Recovery plans support ordered server groups and recovery drills
  • Failback supports on-premises and other source infrastructure
  • Near-synchronous replication with journal-based granular recovery points
  • Clean-room recovery and immutable copies support ransomware resilience
  • Automated failover, failback, migration, testing, and SLA analytics
Cons
  • No free plan; pricing is charged per source server per hour
  • Traffic redirection during failover requires DNS or another service
  • AWS resource and data-transfer costs are billed separately
  • Standard pricing is not published and requires contacting sales
  • The 14-day offer is a trial rather than a free plan
  • Its broad enterprise scope may exceed simpler recovery needs
Our verdict

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a paid disaster recovery service for replicating supported physical, virtual, cloud, and AWS workloads into AWS. It supports Windows and Linux applications, including environments using VMware vSphere,…

Read the review →

Zerto is a data-protection platform for enterprises and managed service providers. It combines continuous data protection, near-synchronous replication, journal-based recovery, disaster recovery orchestration, workload mobility, analytics,…

Read the review →
  1. AWS Elastic Disaster RecoveryDisaster Recovery Software 9.0Paid
  2. ZertoDisaster Recovery Software 8.9Pricing on request · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery — where it wins

    • Continuous block-level replication with point-in-time recovery
    • Recovery plans support ordered server groups and recovery drills
    • Failback supports on-premises and other source infrastructure

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; pricing is charged per source server per hour
    • Traffic redirection during failover requires DNS or another service
    • AWS resource and data-transfer costs are billed separately
  • Zerto — where it wins

    • Near-synchronous replication with journal-based granular recovery points
    • Clean-room recovery and immutable copies support ransomware resilience
    • Automated failover, failback, migration, testing, and SLA analytics

    Where it doesn't

    • Standard pricing is not published and requires contacting sales
    • The 14-day offer is a trial rather than a free plan
    • Its broad enterprise scope may exceed simpler recovery needs
  • AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery9.0/10 · Paid

    A focused AWS recovery service with clear hourly pricing and separate traffic management.

    Visit AWS DRSFull verdict →
  • Zerto8.9/10 · Pricing on request · 14-day trial

    A capable multi-cloud recovery platform for teams that need near-synchronous protection.

    Visit ZertoFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update