Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Disaster Recovery Software

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Datto SIRIS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Datto SIRIS #8 in Disaster Recovery Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Datto SIRIS

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery leads on 0 checks, Datto SIRIS on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAWS Elastic Disaster Recovery · 9.0/10

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery scores higher on our rubric for disaster recovery software: 9.0 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

Datto SIRIS offers failover orchestration; AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery doesn't.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is the better fit for AWS-centric teams with transparent hourly pricing. Datto SIRIS is the better fit for MSPs managing multi-tenant backup DR.

  • AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery fits best

    AWS-centric teams with transparent hourly pricing

  • Datto SIRIS fits best

    MSPs managing multi-tenant backup DR

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Datto SIRIS 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.7
Ranking #4 in Disaster Recovery Software #8 in Disaster Recovery Software
Best for AWS-centric teams with transparent hourly pricing MSPs managing multi-tenant backup DR
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $0.03/unit usage-based Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, Linux Web, Linux
Support Docs Email, Phone, Docs · 24/7
Compliance SOC 2 ISO 27001, SOC 2, 2FA
Integrations 7 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery 3/4 · Datto SIRIS 3/4
Failover orchestration — ✓ (best)
Failback orchestration ✓ ✓
Test failover ✓ ✓
Recovery runbooks ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Supported workloads physical servers, VMware vSphere, Microsoft Hyper-V, Amazon EC2, other cloud infrastructure, Windows and Linux applications, Oracle, MySQL, SQL Server, SAP Windows Server, Linux, VMware, Hyper-V
RPO target Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Continuous block-level replication with point-in-time recovery
  • Recovery plans support ordered server groups and recovery drills
  • Failback supports on-premises and other source infrastructure
  • Five-minute backup frequency with local and Datto Cloud backups
  • Local and cloud virtualization with failback and recovery testing
  • Immutable storage, ransomware detection, and centralized multi-tenant management
Cons
  • No free plan; pricing is charged per source server per hour
  • Traffic redirection during failover requires DNS or another service
  • AWS resource and data-transfer costs are billed separately
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than public plan comparison
  • Multiple deployment options add architecture and planning decisions
  • Its broad DR focus may exceed the needs of simple file backup
Our verdict

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a paid disaster recovery service for replicating supported physical, virtual, cloud, and AWS workloads into AWS. It supports Windows and Linux applications, including environments using VMware vSphere,…

Read the review →

Datto SIRIS is a business continuity and disaster recovery platform for managed service providers and IT teams. It combines backup software, appliances, cloud replication, local and cloud virtualization, file-level restore, bare-metal…

Read the review →
  1. AWS Elastic Disaster RecoveryDisaster Recovery Software 9.0Paid
  2. Datto SIRISDisaster Recovery Software 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery — where it wins

    • Continuous block-level replication with point-in-time recovery
    • Recovery plans support ordered server groups and recovery drills
    • Failback supports on-premises and other source infrastructure

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; pricing is charged per source server per hour
    • Traffic redirection during failover requires DNS or another service
    • AWS resource and data-transfer costs are billed separately
  • Datto SIRIS — where it wins

    • Five-minute backup frequency with local and Datto Cloud backups
    • Local and cloud virtualization with failback and recovery testing
    • Immutable storage, ransomware detection, and centralized multi-tenant management

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than public plan comparison
    • Multiple deployment options add architecture and planning decisions
    • Its broad DR focus may exceed the needs of simple file backup
  • AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery9.0/10 · Paid

    A focused AWS recovery service with clear hourly pricing and separate traffic management.

    Visit AWS DRSFull verdict →
  • Datto SIRIS8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A hybrid DR platform with five-minute backups, virtualization, failback, and multi-tenant management.

    Visit Datto SIRISFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update