Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Additive Manufacturing Software

Autodesk Netfabb vs GrabCAD Print

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Autodesk Netfabb #1 in Additive Manufacturing Software 9.3/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Autodesk
GrabCAD Print #3 in Additive Manufacturing Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit GrabCAD Print

Autodesk Netfabb leads on 0 checks, GrabCAD Print on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAutodesk Netfabb · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Autodesk Netfabb

Autodesk Netfabb scores higher on our rubric for additive manufacturing software: 9.3 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

Autodesk Netfabb is the better fit for industrial teams needing advanced build preparation. GrabCAD Print is the better fit for stratasys teams needing production and fleet workflows.

  • Autodesk Netfabb fits best

    Industrial teams needing advanced build preparation

  • GrabCAD Print fits best

    Stratasys teams needing production and fleet workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Autodesk Netfabb 9.3/10 Visit ↗ GrabCAD Print 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.8
Ranking #1 in Additive Manufacturing Software #3 in Additive Manufacturing Software
Best for Industrial teams needing advanced build preparation Stratasys teams needing production and fleet workflows
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — $5,000/user/yr
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Desktop Cloud, Desktop, Mobile
Platforms Windows Web, Windows, iOS, Android
Support Docs · 24/7 Email, Phone, Docs
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Autodesk Netfabb 0/3 · GrabCAD Print 0/3
Slicer included Not checked yet Not checked yet
Build nesting Not checked yet Not checked yet
Production tracking Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Printer compatibility Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported file formats Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Repairs meshes and handles orientation, packing, and configurable supports.
  • Supports machine-specific and machine-agnostic slicing with toolpath customization.
  • Higher editions add scripting, lattice optimization, and advanced build supports.
  • Imports native CAD and mesh formats with printability validation
  • Combines scheduling, monitoring, notifications, and multi-printer control
  • Pro adds arrays, estimation, analysis, and STL/3MF export
Cons
  • Runs on Windows as desktop software, not a cloud slicing service.
  • Advanced workflow capabilities are split across Standard, Premium, and Ultimate.
  • Metal process simulation is limited.
  • Primarily designed for Stratasys-printer workflows
  • Pro costs $5,000 per user per year on annual billing
  • Available technologies and features vary by printer family
Our verdict

For additive engineers, industrial designers, and mechanical engineers, Autodesk Netfabb provides desktop tools to prepare 3D models for production. Its workflow spans importing, analyzing, repairing, orienting, arranging, supporting,…

Read the review →

GrabCAD Print prepares, schedules, monitors, and reports 3D-print jobs on Stratasys systems. It is aimed at teams working across FDM, PolyJet, P3, SLA, and SAF workflows, with cloud, desktop, mobile, web, Windows, iOS, Android, and API…

Read the review →
  1. Autodesk NetfabbAdditive Manufacturing Software 9.3Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. GrabCAD PrintAdditive Manufacturing Software 8.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Autodesk Netfabb — where it wins

    • Repairs meshes and handles orientation, packing, and configurable supports.
    • Supports machine-specific and machine-agnostic slicing with toolpath customization.
    • Higher editions add scripting, lattice optimization, and advanced build supports.

    Where it doesn't

    • Runs on Windows as desktop software, not a cloud slicing service.
    • Advanced workflow capabilities are split across Standard, Premium, and Ultimate.
    • Metal process simulation is limited.

  • GrabCAD Print — where it wins

    • Imports native CAD and mesh formats with printability validation
    • Combines scheduling, monitoring, notifications, and multi-printer control
    • Pro adds arrays, estimation, analysis, and STL/3MF export

    Where it doesn't

    • Primarily designed for Stratasys-printer workflows
    • Pro costs $5,000 per user per year on annual billing
    • Available technologies and features vary by printer family
  • Autodesk Netfabb9.3/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A Windows build-preparation suite spanning mesh repair, supports, slicing, lattices, and toolpaths.

    Visit AutodeskFull verdict →
  • GrabCAD Print8.8/10 · Free plan

    A broad Stratasys workflow suite with a free tier and paid production controls.

    Visit GrabCAD PrintFull verdict →

More comparisons

All additive manufacturing software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update