Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Additive Manufacturing Software

Autodesk Netfabb vs 3D Sprint

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Autodesk Netfabb #1 in Additive Manufacturing Software 9.3/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Autodesk
3D Sprint #8 in Additive Manufacturing Software 7.8/10 Free plan · pricing on request · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit 3D Systems

Autodesk Netfabb leads on 0 checks, 3D Sprint on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAutodesk Netfabb · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialboth

Autodesk Netfabb scores higher on our rubric for additive manufacturing software: 9.3 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.

Autodesk Netfabb is the better fit for industrial teams needing advanced build preparation. 3D Sprint is the better fit for industrial teams needing repair, nesting, and print checks.

  • Autodesk Netfabb fits best

    Industrial teams needing advanced build preparation

  • 3D Sprint fits best

    Industrial teams needing repair, nesting, and print checks

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Autodesk Netfabb 9.3/10 Visit ↗ 3D Sprint 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 7.8
Ranking #1 in Additive Manufacturing Software #8 in Additive Manufacturing Software
Best for Industrial teams needing advanced build preparation Industrial teams needing repair, nesting, and print checks
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — —
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 30 days 30 days
Free trial length 30 days 30 days
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms Windows Windows
Support Docs · 24/7 Email, Phone
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Autodesk Netfabb 0/3 · 3D Sprint 0/3
Slicer included Not checked yet Not checked yet
Build nesting Not checked yet Not checked yet
Production tracking Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Printer compatibility Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported file formats Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Repairs meshes and handles orientation, packing, and configurable supports.
  • Supports machine-specific and machine-agnostic slicing with toolpath customization.
  • Higher editions add scripting, lattice optimization, and advanced build supports.
  • Automatic supports, polygon repair, nesting and printability checks
  • Imports CAD and polygon data across numerous listed formats
  • Printer queues, monitoring, slicing and material estimates in one desktop workflow
Cons
  • Runs on Windows as desktop software, not a cloud slicing service.
  • Advanced workflow capabilities are split across Standard, Premium, and Ultimate.
  • Metal process simulation is limited.
  • Runs on Windows desktop rather than across multiple platforms
  • Advanced Pro capabilities require a sales-led subscription
  • Basic is complimentary only with qualifying 3D Systems printer purchases
Our verdict

For additive engineers, industrial designers, and mechanical engineers, Autodesk Netfabb provides desktop tools to prepare 3D models for production. Its workflow spans importing, analyzing, repairing, orienting, arranging, supporting,…

Read the review →

3D Sprint is 3D Systems software for preparing CAD and polygon data, optimizing parts, and managing additive-manufacturing jobs on supported 3D Systems plastic printers. It is aimed at manufacturers and organizations operating color-jet,…

Read the review →
  1. Autodesk NetfabbAdditive Manufacturing Software 9.3Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. 3D SprintAdditive Manufacturing Software 7.8Free plan · pricing on request · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Autodesk Netfabb — where it wins

    • Repairs meshes and handles orientation, packing, and configurable supports.
    • Supports machine-specific and machine-agnostic slicing with toolpath customization.
    • Higher editions add scripting, lattice optimization, and advanced build supports.

    Where it doesn't

    • Runs on Windows as desktop software, not a cloud slicing service.
    • Advanced workflow capabilities are split across Standard, Premium, and Ultimate.
    • Metal process simulation is limited.
  • 3D Sprint — where it wins

    • Automatic supports, polygon repair, nesting and printability checks
    • Imports CAD and polygon data across numerous listed formats
    • Printer queues, monitoring, slicing and material estimates in one desktop workflow

    Where it doesn't

    • Runs on Windows desktop rather than across multiple platforms
    • Advanced Pro capabilities require a sales-led subscription
    • Basic is complimentary only with qualifying 3D Systems printer purchases
  • Autodesk Netfabb9.3/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A Windows build-preparation suite spanning mesh repair, supports, slicing, lattices, and toolpaths.

    Visit AutodeskFull verdict →
  • 3D Sprint7.8/10 · Free plan · pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A Windows workflow for preparing, checking, nesting and managing 3D Systems plastic prints.

    Visit 3D SystemsFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update