Head-to-head · SD-WAN Software
Aryaka SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
Aryaka SD-WAN leads on 0 checks, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreAryaka SD-WAN · 7.5/10
Aryaka SD-WAN scores higher on our rubric for sd-wan software: 7.5 against 7.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.
Aryaka SD-WAN is the better fit for managed WAN buyers needing optimization and backbone access. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is the better fit for large Cisco environments needing full SD-WAN.
- Aryaka SD-WAN fits best
Managed WAN buyers needing optimization and backbone access
- Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN fits best
Large Cisco environments needing full SD-WAN
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Aryaka SD-WAN 7.5/10 Visit ↗ | Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN 7.4/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.5 | 7.4 |
| Ranking | #4 in SD-WAN Software | #5 in SD-WAN Software |
| Best for | Managed WAN buyers needing optimization and backbone access | Large Cisco environments needing full SD-WAN |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | Not published | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Integrations | 10 integrations | 12 integrations |
| Features Aryaka SD-WAN 4/4 · Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN 4/4 | ||
| Application-aware routing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zero-touch provisioning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated security | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cloud on-ramps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Site limit | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Aryaka SD-WAN is a managed, cloud-first networking service for distributed enterprises. It connects branch sites, users, applications, data centers, and cloud environments through Aryaka’s private global network, SD-WAN edge appliances,… Read the review → |
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN connects branch offices, campuses, data centers, and cloud environments through centralized management and policy-based routing. It is aimed at enterprise network teams that need to provision, monitor, troubleshoot,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Aryaka SD-WAN — where it wins
- WAN optimization, compression, and application acceleration
- Private backbone, internet, MPLS, and multi-cloud connectivity
- Integrated firewall, segmentation, and IPsec encryption
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contact with sales
- Web-based delivery may not fit teams seeking native client platforms
- Managed operations may not suit organizations wanting fully self-managed WAN control
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN — where it wins
- Application-aware routing measures loss, latency, and jitter.
- Cloud OnRamp connects AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, and SaaS applications.
- Integrated security includes firewall, IPS, URL filtering, and malware protection.
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires a contact-sales process rather than public plan prices.
- There is no free plan.
- Cloud-hosted, on-premises, and customer-managed options require deployment evaluation.
- Aryaka SD-WAN7.5/10 · Pricing on request
A managed SD-WAN for distributed enterprises that need optimization and private-backbone access.
Visit AryakaFull verdict → - Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN7.4/10 · Pricing on request
A broad Cisco SD-WAN platform for large, security-conscious network environments.
Visit CiscoFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Aryaka SD-WAN
- Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
- Fortinet Secure SD-WAN vs Aryaka SD-WAN
- Fortinet Secure SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
- Cato SD-WAN vs Aryaka SD-WAN
- Cato SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
- Aryaka SD-WAN vs Versa Secure SD-WAN
- Aryaka SD-WAN vs HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN
All SD-WAN software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update



