Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · IT Vendor Management Software

Aravo Third-Party Risk Management vs Gatekeeper

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Aravo Third-Party Risk Management #4 in IT Vendor Management Software 7.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Aravo
Gatekeeper #6 in IT Vendor Management Software 7.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Gatekeeper

Aravo Third-Party Risk Management leads on 0 checks, Gatekeeper on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAravo Third-Party Risk Management · 7.9/10
  • Most featuresAravo Third-Party Risk Management · 5 of 5

Aravo Third-Party Risk Management scores higher on our rubric for it vendor management software: 7.9 against 7.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

Aravo Third-Party Risk Management is the better fit for mature enterprise third-party risk programs. Gatekeeper is the better fit for organizations needing full contract-led vendor management.

  • Aravo Third-Party Risk Management fits best

    Mature enterprise third-party risk programs

  • Gatekeeper fits best

    Organizations needing full contract-led vendor management

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Aravo Third-Party Risk Management 7.9/10 Visit ↗ Gatekeeper 7.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.7
Ranking #4 in IT Vendor Management Software #6 in IT Vendor Management Software
Best for Mature enterprise third-party risk programs Organizations needing full contract-led vendor management
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email Email, Phone, Docs
Integrations 13 integrations 1,700+ integrations
Built for Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Aravo Third-Party Risk Management 5/5 · Gatekeeper 0/5
Contract storage ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Renewal alerts ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Performance tracking ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Vendor risk assessments ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Intake workflows ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Vendor limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • Centralizes inventory, intake, assessments, contracts, performance, and remediation
  • Connects with enterprise, risk-intelligence, and in-house systems through APIs
  • Adds continuous monitoring and AI-supported onboarding, assessment, and monitoring
  • Combines contracts, vendors, risk, obligations, renewals, and spend
  • Configurable approvals, AI review, templates, and native e-signatures
  • REST API plus integrations across finance, identity, CRM, and productivity tools
Cons
  • Pricing requires a demo or sales conversation
  • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of smaller vendor programs
  • Configurable workflows can require dedicated governance and process ownership
  • Pricing is quote-based and requires a demo
  • Advanced identity and data controls are limited to higher tiers
  • May be more scope than teams seeking only basic vendor tracking
Our verdict

Aravo Third-Party Risk Management is a cloud-based platform for organizations managing complex vendor, supplier, and other third-party ecosystems. It brings together centralized relationship records, structured intake and onboarding,…

Read the review →

Gatekeeper is a cloud-based contract lifecycle management platform for legal, procurement, finance, and compliance teams. It manages customer and third-party agreements across intake, drafting, negotiation, approval, e-signature,…

Read the review →
  1. Aravo Third-Party Risk ManagementIT Vendor Management Software 7.9Pricing on request
  2. GatekeeperIT Vendor Management Software 7.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Aravo Third-Party Risk Management — where it wins

    • Centralizes inventory, intake, assessments, contracts, performance, and remediation
    • Connects with enterprise, risk-intelligence, and in-house systems through APIs
    • Adds continuous monitoring and AI-supported onboarding, assessment, and monitoring

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a demo or sales conversation
    • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of smaller vendor programs
    • Configurable workflows can require dedicated governance and process ownership
  • Gatekeeper — where it wins

    • Combines contracts, vendors, risk, obligations, renewals, and spend
    • Configurable approvals, AI review, templates, and native e-signatures
    • REST API plus integrations across finance, identity, CRM, and productivity tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is quote-based and requires a demo
    • Advanced identity and data controls are limited to higher tiers
    • May be more scope than teams seeking only basic vendor tracking
  • Aravo Third-Party Risk Management7.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad cloud platform for mature enterprises managing complex third-party risk programs.

    Visit AravoFull verdict →
  • Gatekeeper7.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A full contract-led vendor management platform for complex third-party estates.

    Visit GatekeeperFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update