Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Source Code Management

Apache Subversion vs Perforce TeamHub

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Apache Subversion #5 in Source Code Management 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 4 features Visit site
Perforce TeamHub #7 in Source Code Management 8.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Perforce

Apache Subversion leads on 1 check, Perforce TeamHub on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreApache Subversion · 8.5/10
  • Free planonly Apache Subversion
  • Most featuresApache Subversion · 1 of 4

Apache Subversion scores higher on our rubric for source code management: 8.5 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

Apache Subversion offers free plan; Perforce TeamHub doesn't.

Apache Subversion is the better fit for teams preferring centralized, self-hosted version control. Perforce TeamHub is the better fit for teams hosting several repository and artifact types.

  • Apache Subversion fits best

    Teams preferring centralized, self-hosted version control

  • Perforce TeamHub fits best

    Teams hosting several repository and artifact types

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Apache Subversion 8.5/10 Visit ↗ Perforce TeamHub 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 8.2
Ranking #5 in Source Code Management #7 in Source Code Management
Best for Teams preferring centralized, self-hosted version control Teams hosting several repository and artifact types
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free plan —
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Community, Docs Email, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Apache Subversion 1/4 · Perforce TeamHub 0/4
Self-hosted option ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Branch protection Not checked yet Not checked yet
Built-in code review Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free private repos Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Repository visibility Not checked yet Not checked yet
Storage limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Keeps complete revision history in a centralized repository
  • Supports atomic commits, merge tracking, and optional file locking
  • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with two server options
  • Hosts Git, Mercurial, SVN, Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV repositories
  • Combines code reviews, wiki, issue tracking, search, and authorization
  • Offers cloud or on-premises deployment with 75 integrations
Cons
  • Uses a centralized rather than distributed versioning model
  • Requires choosing between Apache HTTP Server/WebDAV and svnserve
  • Support channels are community resources and documentation
  • Pricing is quote-based, with no free plan available
  • Build automation relies on external Jenkins rather than native CI/CD
  • Cloud storage is limited to 1GB or 5GB per seat by plan
Our verdict

Apache Subversion is an open-source version control system built around a central repository that stores the complete revision history of versioned data. It suits individuals and development teams that prefer a centralized model, including…

Read the review →

Perforce TeamHub is a repository hosting and collaboration platform for development teams managing more than one source-control or package format. It supports Git, Mercurial, and SVN repositories, plus Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV…

Read the review →
  1. Apache SubversionSource Code Management 8.5Free plan
  2. Perforce TeamHubSource Code Management 8.2Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Apache Subversion — where it wins

    • Keeps complete revision history in a centralized repository
    • Supports atomic commits, merge tracking, and optional file locking
    • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with two server options

    Where it doesn't

    • Uses a centralized rather than distributed versioning model
    • Requires choosing between Apache HTTP Server/WebDAV and svnserve
    • Support channels are community resources and documentation

  • Perforce TeamHub — where it wins

    • Hosts Git, Mercurial, SVN, Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV repositories
    • Combines code reviews, wiki, issue tracking, search, and authorization
    • Offers cloud or on-premises deployment with 75 integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is quote-based, with no free plan available
    • Build automation relies on external Jenkins rather than native CI/CD
    • Cloud storage is limited to 1GB or 5GB per seat by plan
  • Apache Subversion8.5/10 · Free plan

    A free, self-hosted system for teams that want centralized revision history.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • Perforce TeamHub8.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad repository hub for mixed code and artifact environments, with quote-based pricing.

    Visit PerforceFull verdict →

More comparisons

All source code management comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update