Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Source Code Management

Apache Subversion vs Perforce TeamHub

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Apache Subversion #6 in Source Code Management —/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 4 features Visit site
Higher score Perforce TeamHub #8 in Source Code Management 3.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Perforce

Apache Subversion leads on 2 checks, Perforce TeamHub on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorePerforce TeamHub · 3.0/10
  • Free planonly Apache Subversion
  • Most featuresApache Subversion · 1 of 4

Our editors rank Apache Subversion at #6 and Perforce TeamHub at #8 for source code management; Apache Subversion has no rubric score yet (facts researched, not yet scored), so the checks below decide.

Apache Subversion offers free plan; Perforce TeamHub doesn't. Apache Subversion offers self-hosted option; Perforce TeamHub doesn't publish it.

Apache Subversion is the better fit for teams preferring centralized, self-hosted version control. Perforce TeamHub is the better fit for teams hosting several repository and artifact types.

  • Apache Subversion fits best

    Teams preferring centralized, self-hosted version control

  • Perforce TeamHub fits best

    Teams hosting several repository and artifact types

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Apache Subversion —/10 Visit ↗ Perforce TeamHub 3.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score — 3.0
Ranking #6 in Source Code Management #8 in Source Code Management
Best for Teams preferring centralized, self-hosted version control Teams hosting several repository and artifact types
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Community, Docs Email, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Apache Subversion 1/4 · Perforce TeamHub 0/4
Self-hosted option ✓ (best) Not published
Branch protection Not published Not published
Built-in code review Not published Not published
Free private repos Not published Not published
Specs
Repository visibility Not published Not published
Storage limit Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Keeps complete revision history in a centralized repository
  • Supports atomic commits, merge tracking, and optional file locking
  • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with two server options
  • Hosts Git, Mercurial, SVN, Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV repositories
  • Combines code reviews, wiki, issue tracking, search, and authorization
  • Offers cloud or on-premises deployment with 75 integrations
Cons
  • Uses a centralized rather than distributed versioning model
  • Requires choosing between Apache HTTP Server/WebDAV and svnserve
  • Support channels are community resources and documentation
  • Pricing is quote-based, with no free plan available
  • Build automation relies on external Jenkins rather than native CI/CD
  • Cloud storage is limited to 1GB or 5GB per seat by plan
Our verdict

Apache Subversion is an open-source version control system built around a central repository that stores the complete revision history of versioned data. It suits individuals and development teams that prefer a centralized model, including…

Read the review →

Perforce TeamHub is a repository hosting and collaboration platform for development teams managing more than one source-control or package format. It supports Git, Mercurial, and SVN repositories, plus Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV…

Read the review →
  1. Apache SubversionSource Code Management —Free plan
  2. Perforce TeamHubSource Code Management 3.0Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Apache Subversion — where it wins

    • Keeps complete revision history in a centralized repository
    • Supports atomic commits, merge tracking, and optional file locking
    • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with two server options

    Where it doesn't

    • Uses a centralized rather than distributed versioning model
    • Requires choosing between Apache HTTP Server/WebDAV and svnserve
    • Support channels are community resources and documentation

  • Perforce TeamHub — where it wins

    • Hosts Git, Mercurial, SVN, Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV repositories
    • Combines code reviews, wiki, issue tracking, search, and authorization
    • Offers cloud or on-premises deployment with 75 integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is quote-based, with no free plan available
    • Build automation relies on external Jenkins rather than native CI/CD
    • Cloud storage is limited to 1GB or 5GB per seat by plan
  • Apache Subversion—/10 · Free plan

    A free, self-hosted system for teams that want centralized revision history.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • Perforce TeamHub3.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad repository hub for mixed code and artifact environments, with quote-based pricing.

    Visit PerforceFull verdict →

More comparisons

All source code management comparisons → · Full ranking →

Guides on source code management

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026