Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Version Control Software

Apache Subversion vs Mercurial

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Apache Subversion #4 in Version Control Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Subversion
Mercurial #12 in Version Control Software 7.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Mercurial

Apache Subversion leads on 0 checks, Mercurial on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreApache Subversion · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresApache Subversion · 4 of 4

Apache Subversion scores higher on our rubric for version control software: 8.8 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #12.

On versioning model, Apache Subversion gives you Centralized where Mercurial offers Distributed. On large-file handling, Apache Subversion gives you Native where Mercurial offers Extension.

Apache Subversion is the better fit for free centralized version control. Mercurial is the better fit for free distributed offline workflows.

  • Apache Subversion fits best

    Free centralized version control

  • Mercurial fits best

    Free distributed offline workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Apache Subversion 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Mercurial 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 7.8
Ranking #4 in Version Control Software #12 in Version Control Software
Best for Free centralized version control Free distributed offline workflows
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Apache Subversion 4/4 · Mercurial 3/4
Self-hosted deployment ✓ ✓
File locking ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Sparse checkout ✓ ✓
Nested repositories ✓ ✓
Specs
Versioning model Centralized Distributed
Desktop platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Large-file handling Native Extension
Our review
Pros
  • Atomic commits, merge tracking, branching, and tagging
  • Native binary handling, file locking, and sparse checkouts
  • Self-hosted and cross-platform across Windows, macOS, and Linux
  • Complete local history supports offline commits and history inspection
  • Extensions add large-file handling, sparse checkout, and commands
  • Supports Windows, GNU/Linux, macOS, and nested repositories
Cons
  • Centralized workflows are less suited to teams seeking distributed version control
  • Self-hosted deployment requires managing svnserve or Apache HTTP Server
  • Third-party packages require separate consideration across desktop platforms
  • Sparse checkout is documented as an experimental extension
  • Large-file handling depends on the largefiles extension
  • Web publishing requires the hgweb interface
Our verdict

Apache Subversion is a free, open-source, centralized version control system for individuals, development teams, and enterprise projects. It manages versioned files and directories through client/server repository access, with support for…

Read the review →

Mercurial is a free, open-source distributed version control system for developers and teams managing versioned files and software projects. Its distributed repository architecture gives each clone a complete project history, so users can…

Read the review →
  1. Apache SubversionVersion Control Software 8.8Free plan
  2. MercurialVersion Control Software 7.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Apache Subversion — where it wins

    • Atomic commits, merge tracking, branching, and tagging
    • Native binary handling, file locking, and sparse checkouts
    • Self-hosted and cross-platform across Windows, macOS, and Linux

    Where it doesn't

    • Centralized workflows are less suited to teams seeking distributed version control
    • Self-hosted deployment requires managing svnserve or Apache HTTP Server
    • Third-party packages require separate consideration across desktop platforms

  • Mercurial — where it wins

    • Complete local history supports offline commits and history inspection
    • Extensions add large-file handling, sparse checkout, and commands
    • Supports Windows, GNU/Linux, macOS, and nested repositories

    Where it doesn't

    • Sparse checkout is documented as an experimental extension
    • Large-file handling depends on the largefiles extension
    • Web publishing requires the hgweb interface

More comparisons

All version control software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update