Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · RDF Databases

Apache Jena Fuseki vs RDFox

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Apache Jena Fuseki #7 in RDF Databases 8.5/10 Open source ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Apache Jena
RDFox #8 in RDF Databases 8.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 3 features Visit RDFox

Apache Jena Fuseki leads on 0 checks, RDFox on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreApache Jena Fuseki · 8.5/10
  • Most featuresApache Jena Fuseki · 3 of 3

Apache Jena Fuseki scores higher on our rubric for rdf databases: 8.5 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.

Apache Jena Fuseki is the better fit for reliable self-hosted open-source RDF services. RDFox is the better fit for enterprises needing advanced semantic reasoning.

  • Apache Jena Fuseki fits best

    Reliable self-hosted open-source RDF services

  • RDFox fits best

    Enterprises needing advanced semantic reasoning

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Apache Jena Fuseki 8.5/10 Visit ↗ RDFox 8.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 8.4
Ranking #7 in RDF Databases #8 in RDF Databases
Best for Reliable self-hosted open-source RDF services Enterprises needing advanced semantic reasoning
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Open source Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Windows, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Email, Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Apache Jena Fuseki 3/3 · RDFox 0/3
Reasoning support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
RDF-star support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Federated queries ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment options Self-hosted Not checked yet
SPARQL support Sparql 1.1 Not checked yet
Supported RDF formats Turtle, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads, JSON-LD Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports SPARQL 1.1, Graph Store, federation, and RDF-star
  • Offers standalone, service, web application, embedded, and Docker deployment
  • Combines TDB1, TDB2, in-memory storage, inference, and access control
  • Supports SPARQL 1.1, OWL 2, SWRL and Datalog reasoning.
  • Incremental reasoning can materialize derived facts automatically.
  • Offers REST and Java APIs, a web console and high availability.
Cons
  • Requires a self-hosted deployment rather than a hosted cloud service
  • Inference depends on rule-based, RDFS, or OWL configuration
  • Its scope is focused on RDF datasets and SPARQL workflows
  • No free plan; access to pricing requires contacting sales.
  • Its semantic reasoning focus may exceed simpler RDF storage needs.
  • Deployment and API options may require technical setup.
Our verdict

Apache Jena Fuseki is an open-source SPARQL server for publishing, querying, and updating RDF datasets over HTTP. It is suited to teams that need a self-hosted RDF service with SPARQL 1.1 query and update protocols, Graph Store support,…

Read the review →

RDFox is an in-memory knowledge graph database and semantic reasoning engine from Oxford Semantic Technologies. It stores RDF data, supports SPARQL 1.1 queries, and derives facts from rules and ontological axioms. The product is aimed at…

Read the review →
  1. Apache Jena FusekiRDF Databases 8.5Open source
  2. RDFoxRDF Databases 8.4Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Apache Jena Fuseki — where it wins

    • Supports SPARQL 1.1, Graph Store, federation, and RDF-star
    • Offers standalone, service, web application, embedded, and Docker deployment
    • Combines TDB1, TDB2, in-memory storage, inference, and access control

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires a self-hosted deployment rather than a hosted cloud service
    • Inference depends on rule-based, RDFS, or OWL configuration
    • Its scope is focused on RDF datasets and SPARQL workflows

  • RDFox — where it wins

    • Supports SPARQL 1.1, OWL 2, SWRL and Datalog reasoning.
    • Incremental reasoning can materialize derived facts automatically.
    • Offers REST and Java APIs, a web console and high availability.

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; access to pricing requires contacting sales.
    • Its semantic reasoning focus may exceed simpler RDF storage needs.
    • Deployment and API options may require technical setup.
  • Apache Jena Fuseki8.5/10 · Open source

    An open-source RDF server with broad deployment, storage, inference, and access-control options.

    Visit Apache JenaFull verdict →
  • RDFox8.4/10 · Pricing on request

    RDFox combines SPARQL querying with rule-based and ontology-driven reasoning for RDF data.

    Visit RDFoxFull verdict →

More comparisons

All RDF databases comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update