Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Object Storage Services

Amazon S3 vs SeaweedFS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Amazon S3 #2 in Object Storage Services 9.3/10 From $0.02/mo ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Amazon S3
SeaweedFS #8 in Object Storage Services 8.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit SeaweedFS

Amazon S3 leads on 0 checks, SeaweedFS on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAmazon S3 · 9.3/10
  • Free planonly SeaweedFS

Amazon S3 scores higher on our rubric for object storage services: 9.3 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #8.

SeaweedFS offers free plan; Amazon S3 doesn't.

Amazon S3 is the better fit for enterprise AWS-native object storage. SeaweedFS is the better fit for open-source storage with file and data-lake access.

  • Amazon S3 fits best

    Enterprise AWS-native object storage

  • SeaweedFS fits best

    Open-source storage with file and data-lake access

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Amazon S3 9.3/10 Visit ↗ SeaweedFS 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.6
Ranking #2 in Object Storage Services #8 in Object Storage Services
Best for Enterprise AWS-native object storage Open-source storage with file and data-lake access
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $0.02/mo $20/GB/yr
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Desktop, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Linux, macOS, Windows
Integrations 8 integrations 14 integrations
Features Amazon S3 4/4 · SeaweedFS 4/4
S3 compatibility ✓ ✓
Object versioning ✓ ✓
Lifecycle rules ✓ ✓
Object immutability ✓ ✓
Specs
Max object size 50000 GB Not checked yet
Replication scope Cross-region Cross-region
Our review
Pros
  • Cross-Region Replication, versioning, and Object Lock retention controls
  • Storage classes and lifecycle rules support archiving and deletion workflows
  • REST API, SDK, CLI, console, and broad AWS service integrations
  • S3-compatible API plus POSIX and FUSE file access
  • Versioning, lifecycle rules, Object Lock, and replication
  • Kubernetes support with Helm and CSI integration
Cons
  • No free plan is available
  • Pricing varies by region, storage class, requests, and data transfer
  • Its broad feature set is centered on AWS services and tooling
  • Free use is limited to development and testing under 25 TB
  • Production deployments require a paid license
  • Enterprise pricing is custom for 5 PB and above
Our verdict

Amazon S3 is a cloud object storage service built around buckets for storing, organizing, protecting, and retrieving data. It suits organizations managing applications, data lakes, backups, archives, analytics workloads, and content…

Read the review →

SeaweedFS is a self-hosted distributed storage system for teams that need object, file, and data-lake access in one deployment. It provides an S3-compatible object storage API, POSIX and FUSE access, HDFS compatibility, WebDAV, and Iceberg…

Read the review →
  1. Amazon S3Object Storage Services 9.3From $0.02/mo
  2. SeaweedFSObject Storage Services 8.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Amazon S3 — where it wins

    • Cross-Region Replication, versioning, and Object Lock retention controls
    • Storage classes and lifecycle rules support archiving and deletion workflows
    • REST API, SDK, CLI, console, and broad AWS service integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • Pricing varies by region, storage class, requests, and data transfer
    • Its broad feature set is centered on AWS services and tooling
  • SeaweedFS — where it wins

    • S3-compatible API plus POSIX and FUSE file access
    • Versioning, lifecycle rules, Object Lock, and replication
    • Kubernetes support with Helm and CSI integration

    Where it doesn't

    • Free use is limited to development and testing under 25 TB
    • Production deployments require a paid license
    • Enterprise pricing is custom for 5 PB and above

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update