Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Relational Databases

Amazon Aurora vs Amazon RDS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Amazon Aurora #5 in Relational Databases 9.0/10 Paid ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit AWS Aurora
Amazon RDS #8 in Relational Databases 8.7/10 Paid ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Amazon RDS

Amazon Aurora leads on 0 checks, Amazon RDS on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAmazon Aurora · 9.0/10

Amazon Aurora scores higher on our rubric for relational databases: 9.0 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

On deployment model, Amazon RDS gives you Both where Amazon Aurora offers Cloud.

Amazon Aurora is the better fit for scalable managed PostgreSQL or MySQL. Amazon RDS is the better fit for managed multi-engine AWS databases.

  • Amazon Aurora fits best

    Scalable managed PostgreSQL or MySQL

  • Amazon RDS fits best

    Managed multi-engine AWS databases

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Amazon Aurora 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Amazon RDS 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.7
Ranking #5 in Relational Databases #8 in Relational Databases
Best for Scalable managed PostgreSQL or MySQL Managed multi-engine AWS databases
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — Not checked yet
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Live chat, Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs · 24/7 Phone, Live chat, Email, Community, Docs · 24/7
Compliance SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS
Integrations 9 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Amazon Aurora 4/4 · Amazon RDS 4/4
Managed service ✓ ✓
High availability ✓ ✓
Read replicas ✓ ✓
JSON data support ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Cloud Both
Backup retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Maximum connections Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • PostgreSQL- and MySQL-compatible engines with serverless options
  • Automatic scaling, failover, backups, and point-in-time recovery
  • Up to 15 read replicas plus multi-Region database support
  • Supports eight database engines in a managed AWS service
  • Includes Multi-AZ failover, read replicas, backups, and point-in-time restore
  • Connects with IAM, VPC, CloudWatch, RDS Proxy, and Outposts
Cons
  • No permanent free plan
  • Pricing varies by region, engine, capacity, storage, and I/O
  • Cloud-based service with AWS ecosystem dependencies
  • No free plan is available
  • Usage-based pricing varies by region, engine, instance, storage, and configuration
  • AWS-focused deployment may not suit teams seeking a standalone database platform
Our verdict

Amazon Aurora is a fully managed, cloud-based relational database service from Amazon Web Services. It supports PostgreSQL- and MySQL-compatible engines, along with Aurora DSQL, a distributed SQL engine. Provisioned and serverless…

Read the review →

Amazon RDS is a managed relational database service for deploying, operating, and scaling databases in the AWS environment. It automates infrastructure provisioning, patching, backups, and failure recovery while leaving users to configure…

Read the review →
  1. Amazon AuroraRelational Databases 9.0Paid
  2. Amazon RDSRelational Databases 8.7Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Amazon Aurora — where it wins

    • PostgreSQL- and MySQL-compatible engines with serverless options
    • Automatic scaling, failover, backups, and point-in-time recovery
    • Up to 15 read replicas plus multi-Region database support

    Where it doesn't

    • No permanent free plan
    • Pricing varies by region, engine, capacity, storage, and I/O
    • Cloud-based service with AWS ecosystem dependencies
  • Amazon RDS — where it wins

    • Supports eight database engines in a managed AWS service
    • Includes Multi-AZ failover, read replicas, backups, and point-in-time restore
    • Connects with IAM, VPC, CloudWatch, RDS Proxy, and Outposts

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • Usage-based pricing varies by region, engine, instance, storage, and configuration
    • AWS-focused deployment may not suit teams seeking a standalone database platform

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update