Allure Report vs Tesults

Allure Report9.4Visit Tesults8.6Visit

Higher score Allure Report #1 in Test Analytics Software 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Allure Report

vs

Tesults #9 in Test Analytics Software 8.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Tesults

• Allure Report fits best

  Open-source teams needing broad test analytics

• Tesults fits best

  Teams wanting low-cost multi-framework reporting

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Allure Report 9.4/10 Visit ↗	Tesults 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.4	8.6
Ranking	#1 in Test Analytics Software	#9 in Test Analytics Software
Best for	Open-source teams needing broad test analytics	Teams wanting low-cost multi-framework reporting
Pricing model	Free	Free plan + paid
Starting price	Free plan	$19/user/mo
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Self-hosted, Desktop	Cloud, Mobile
Platforms	Web, Windows, macOS, Linux	Web, iOS, Android
Support	Community, Docs	Email, Docs
Integrations	10 integrations	6 integrations
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Allure Report 4/4 · Tesults 3/4
Flaky-test detection	✓	✓
Failure analysis	✓	✓
Execution trend reports	✓	✓
Self-hosted deployment	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Specs
Supported frameworks	AVA, Axios, Behat, Behave, Bun, Chai, Codeception, CodeceptJS, Cucumber.js, Cucumber-JVM, Cucumber.rb, Cypress, Dart and Flutter, Diesel, Fetch, Go, Jasmine, Jest, JBehave, JUnit 4, JUnit 5, Mocha, Newman, Node.js Test Runner, NUnit, PHPUnit, Playwright, Playwright Java, pytest, Pytest-BDD, Reqnroll, Reqwest, REST Assured, Robot Framework, Rust Cargo Test, RSpec, Selenide, Selenium BiDi, SpecFlow, Spock, TestCafe, TestNG, Vitest, WebdriverIO, xUnit.net	EXP, GoogleTest, Rust #[test], nextest, rstest, JUnit 5, JUnit 4, TestNG, pytest, Robot Framework, NUnit 3, xUnit, MSTest, RSpec, Mocha, Jasmine, Jest, Playwright, WebdriverIO, CodeceptJS, Nightwatch, Vitest, Waffle, Postman, Protractor, Cypress, TestCafe, XCTest, Espresso, Selenium, ROS 2, colcon
CI/CD integrations	Azure DevOps, Bamboo, GitHub Actions, Jenkins, TeamCity	GitHub Actions
Data retention	Not checked yet	90 days
Our review
Pros	Supports a wide range of programming languages and test frameworks Tracks flaky tests, retries, history, failures, trends, and quality gates Integrates with major CI/CD tools, IDEs, Jira, Maven, and Gradle	Lifetime free plan with unlimited users and third-party integrations Flaky-test detection, regression analysis, and failure explanations Supports a broad range of testing frameworks and result formats
Cons	Focused on test reporting rather than test execution or test management Self-hosted report storage adds deployment and maintenance responsibilities Teams need an existing automated test pipeline to generate results	CI integration is limited to GitHub Actions Free plan limits automated history to 30 days Paid plans use active-user pricing and separate storage limits
Our verdict	Allure Report is an open-source framework for turning automated test results into interactive HTML reports. It is intended for QA engineers, developers, testers, and project teams that need to inspect execution results and share reports… Read the review →	Tesults is a cloud-based test reporting and analytics platform for engineering and QA teams. It collects automated and manual test results, stores historical runs, and presents dashboards for test trends, run comparisons, regression… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Allure Report — where it wins

  • Supports a wide range of programming languages and test frameworks
  • Tracks flaky tests, retries, history, failures, trends, and quality gates
  • Integrates with major CI/CD tools, IDEs, Jira, Maven, and Gradle

  Where it doesn't

  • Focused on test reporting rather than test execution or test management
  • Self-hosted report storage adds deployment and maintenance responsibilities
  • Teams need an existing automated test pipeline to generate results

• Tesults — where it wins

  • Lifetime free plan with unlimited users and third-party integrations
  • Flaky-test detection, regression analysis, and failure explanations
  • Supports a broad range of testing frameworks and result formats

  Where it doesn't

  • CI integration is limited to GitHub Actions
  • Free plan limits automated history to 30 days
  • Paid plans use active-user pricing and separate storage limits

• Allure Report9.4/10 · Free plan

  A broad, free reporting layer for teams that need detailed test analytics across frameworks.

  Visit Allure ReportFull verdict →
• Tesults8.6/10 · Free plan

  Low-cost test analytics with broad framework coverage and focused CI connectivity.

  Visit TesultsFull verdict →