Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · IPFS Hosting Services

4EVERLAND vs IPFS.NINJA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
4EVERLAND #6 in IPFS Hosting Services 7.9/10 Free plan · 7-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit 4EVERLAND
IPFS.NINJA #8 in IPFS Hosting Services 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit IPFS.NINJA

4EVERLAND leads on 0 checks, IPFS.NINJA on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly 4EVERLAND
  • Most featuresIPFS.NINJA · 3 of 4

4EVERLAND and IPFS.NINJA score identically on our rubric (7.9 out of 10) for ipfs hosting services; 4EVERLAND sits at #6 and IPFS.NINJA at #8 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

4EVERLAND is the better fit for teams combining IPFS hosting with deployment tools. IPFS.NINJA is the better fit for developers needing IPFS pinning and S3-compatible APIs.

  • 4EVERLAND fits best

    Teams combining IPFS hosting with deployment tools

  • IPFS.NINJA fits best

    Developers needing IPFS pinning and S3-compatible APIs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature 4EVERLAND 7.9/10 Visit ↗ IPFS.NINJA 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.9
Ranking #6 in IPFS Hosting Services #8 in IPFS Hosting Services
Best for Teams combining IPFS hosting with deployment tools Developers needing IPFS pinning and S3-compatible APIs
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — —
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 7 days —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Integrations 4 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features 4EVERLAND 0/4 · IPFS.NINJA 3/4
Managed gateway Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Custom gateway domains Not checked yet Not checked yet
S3-compatible API Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Developer API Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Included storage Not checked yet 10 GB
Gateway bandwidth Not checked yet 20 GB/mo
Maximum file size Not checked yet 5 GB
Our review
Pros
  • Combines IPFS upload, pinning, fetching, gateways, and website deployment.
  • Standard includes 6 GB of IPFS storage and 250 build minutes per month.
  • Supports GitHub deployments, custom domains, and an S3-compatible bucket API.
  • Supports S3-compatible uploads, downloads, listing, and deletion
  • Offers REST APIs, API key management, and signed upload tokens
  • Paid plans include dedicated gateway access
Cons
  • The Trial plan lasts 7 days and includes only 1 GB of IPFS storage.
  • Several resources, including bandwidth and build time, are billed by usage.
  • Arweave storage uses dynamic pricing determined by the Arweave network.
  • The free Dharma plan uses shared public-gateway access
  • Individual PUT uploads are limited to 100 MB
  • Multipart uploads are capped at 5 GB
Our verdict

4EVERLAND brings IPFS storage and web deployment together for developers, projects, and businesses building with decentralized infrastructure. Teams can upload, pin, and fetch files through web interfaces, CLI, or SDK access, then use IPFS…

Read the review →

IPFS.NINJA is a hosted service for pinning files to IPFS and serving them through gateways. Its web dashboard and developer APIs make it relevant to developers building file workflows, while S3-compatible operations can suit teams adapting…

Read the review →
  1. 4EVERLANDIPFS Hosting Services 7.9Free plan · 7-day trial
  2. IPFS.NINJAIPFS Hosting Services 7.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • 4EVERLAND — where it wins

    • Combines IPFS upload, pinning, fetching, gateways, and website deployment.
    • Standard includes 6 GB of IPFS storage and 250 build minutes per month.
    • Supports GitHub deployments, custom domains, and an S3-compatible bucket API.

    Where it doesn't

    • The Trial plan lasts 7 days and includes only 1 GB of IPFS storage.
    • Several resources, including bandwidth and build time, are billed by usage.
    • Arweave storage uses dynamic pricing determined by the Arweave network.

  • IPFS.NINJA — where it wins

    • Supports S3-compatible uploads, downloads, listing, and deletion
    • Offers REST APIs, API key management, and signed upload tokens
    • Paid plans include dedicated gateway access

    Where it doesn't

    • The free Dharma plan uses shared public-gateway access
    • Individual PUT uploads are limited to 100 MB
    • Multipart uploads are capped at 5 GB
  • 4EVERLAND7.9/10 · Free plan · 7-day trial

    IPFS storage and website deployment with free monthly resources and usage-based billing.

    Visit 4EVERLANDFull verdict →
  • IPFS.NINJA7.9/10 · Free plan

    A hosted IPFS service for file pinning, API-based transfers, and managed gateway access.

    Visit IPFS.NINJAFull verdict →

More comparisons

All IPFS hosting services comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update