Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · IPFS Hosting Services

Filebase vs IPFS.NINJA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Filebase #4 in IPFS Hosting Services 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Filebase
IPFS.NINJA #8 in IPFS Hosting Services 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit IPFS.NINJA

Filebase leads on 0 checks, IPFS.NINJA on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresIPFS.NINJA · 3 of 4

Filebase and IPFS.NINJA score identically on our rubric (7.9 out of 10) for ipfs hosting services; Filebase sits at #4 and IPFS.NINJA at #8 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

Filebase is the better fit for teams wanting IPFS pinning and S3 workflows. IPFS.NINJA is the better fit for developers needing IPFS pinning and S3-compatible APIs.

  • Filebase fits best

    Teams wanting IPFS pinning and S3 workflows

  • IPFS.NINJA fits best

    Developers needing IPFS pinning and S3-compatible APIs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Filebase 7.9/10 Visit ↗ IPFS.NINJA 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.9
Ranking #4 in IPFS Hosting Services #8 in IPFS Hosting Services
Best for Teams wanting IPFS pinning and S3 workflows Developers needing IPFS pinning and S3-compatible APIs
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $7.50/mo —
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Integrations 15 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Filebase 0/4 · IPFS.NINJA 3/4
Managed gateway Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Custom gateway domains Not checked yet Not checked yet
S3-compatible API Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Developer API Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Included storage Not checked yet 10 GB
Gateway bandwidth Not checked yet 20 GB/mo
Maximum file size Not checked yet 5 GB
Our review
Pros
  • Combines S3-compatible object storage with IPFS pinning and CID management
  • Free plan includes 5 GB pooled storage and 500 pinned files
  • Works with AWS CLI and SDKs, storage clients, CDNs, and Kubernetes
  • Supports S3-compatible uploads, downloads, listing, and deletion
  • Offers REST APIs, API key management, and signed upload tokens
  • Paid plans include dedicated gateway access
Cons
  • Free plan is limited to 5 GB pooled storage and one IPFS bucket
  • Client-side encryption is not built in
  • Enterprise pricing is volume-based rather than a fixed monthly price
  • The free Dharma plan uses shared public-gateway access
  • Individual PUT uploads are limited to 100 MB
  • Multipart uploads are capped at 5 GB
Our verdict

Filebase combines S3-compatible object storage with IPFS pinning and CID management, giving developers and teams a way to work with both storage models through one cloud service. It supports uploads through S3-compatible tools or APIs,…

Read the review →

IPFS.NINJA is a hosted service for pinning files to IPFS and serving them through gateways. Its web dashboard and developer APIs make it relevant to developers building file workflows, while S3-compatible operations can suit teams adapting…

Read the review →
  1. FilebaseIPFS Hosting Services 7.9Free plan
  2. IPFS.NINJAIPFS Hosting Services 7.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Filebase — where it wins

    • Combines S3-compatible object storage with IPFS pinning and CID management
    • Free plan includes 5 GB pooled storage and 500 pinned files
    • Works with AWS CLI and SDKs, storage clients, CDNs, and Kubernetes

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 5 GB pooled storage and one IPFS bucket
    • Client-side encryption is not built in
    • Enterprise pricing is volume-based rather than a fixed monthly price

  • IPFS.NINJA — where it wins

    • Supports S3-compatible uploads, downloads, listing, and deletion
    • Offers REST APIs, API key management, and signed upload tokens
    • Paid plans include dedicated gateway access

    Where it doesn't

    • The free Dharma plan uses shared public-gateway access
    • Individual PUT uploads are limited to 100 MB
    • Multipart uploads are capped at 5 GB

More comparisons

All IPFS hosting services comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update