Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

The Best Model Monitoring Software in 2026

We researched model monitoring software from official websites, including pricing pages, plan tables and product documentation. Products are ranked on coverage of the category’s core job, value for money and verified features, helping teams compare tools for monitoring deployed models in production.

Our top picks

  1. Top ranked

    Arize AX#1 of 24
    9.4/10

    Broad monitoring for LLMs and agents, with tracing, evaluations, and cost visibility.

    Free plan

  2. Runner-up

    9.3/10

    A free Phoenix platform for tracing, evaluating, and improving LLM applications.

    Free plan

  3. Top-ranked free plan

    W&B Weave#3 of 24
    9.1/10

    A mature monitoring platform for teams operating complex LLM applications and agents.

    Free plan · 30-day trial

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

The full ranking 24 tools, best first

24 tools
  1. Arize AX

    Best forBroad LLM and agent monitoring teams

    Broad monitoring for LLMs and agents, with tracing, evaluations, and cost visibility.

    9.4/10★★★★★
    Visit Arize AX
  2. Best forTeams wanting open-source LLM monitoring

    A free Phoenix platform for tracing, evaluating, and improving LLM applications.

    9.3/10★★★★★
    Visit Arize Phoenix
  3. W&B Weave

    Best forMature teams monitoring LLM applications

    A mature monitoring platform for teams operating complex LLM applications and agents.

    9.1/10★★★★★
    Visit W&B Weave
  4. Langfuse

    Best forOpen-source teams needing complete LLM observability

    A broad LLM monitoring platform with open-source, self-hosted, and managed deployment options.

    9.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Langfuse
  5. Opik

    Best forBudget-conscious teams needing broad LLM monitoring

    Broad LLM monitoring with open-source, free-cloud, and $19/month Pro options.

    8.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Opik
  6. LangSmith

    Best forLangChain teams needing hosted monitoring

    A broad monitoring platform for teams building and operating LLM applications.

    8.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit LangSmith
  7. HoneyHive

    Best forTeams monitoring complex agent workflows

    A broad monitoring and evaluation platform for complex LLM and agent workflows.

    8.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit HoneyHive
  8. LangWatch

    Best forTeams needing agent, RAG, and cost monitoring

    A broad monitoring platform for tracing, evaluating, testing, and controlling AI systems.

    8.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit LangWatch
  9. Helicone

    Best forTeams wanting gateway-based LLM observability

    A gateway-centered monitoring platform with tracing, evaluations, cost analytics, and self-hosting.

    Free plan · 7-day trial Our Helicone verdict → Visit Helicone
    8.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Helicone
  10. OpenLIT

    Best forSelf-hosted teams monitoring full LLM stacks

    A self-hosted observability suite for tracing, evaluating, and managing full LLM stacks.

    8.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit OpenLIT
  11. Best forOpen-source evaluation-focused monitoring teams

    A broad open-source toolkit for evaluating, tracing, and monitoring production AI systems.

    8.3/10★★★★☆
    Visit Evidently AI
  12. Best forOrganizations prioritizing evaluation governance

    A governance-focused platform with broad evaluation, tracing, and deployment controls.

    8.2/10★★★★☆
    Visit Braintrust
  13. Galileo

    Best forTeams combining evaluations and runtime guardrails

    A strong fit for teams connecting AI evaluations, tracing, and runtime guardrails.

    8.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit Galileo
  14. Maxim AI

    Best forTeams needing affordable evaluation workflows

    A broad AI evaluation and monitoring workspace with a low-cost paid entry point.

    Free plan · 14-day trial Our Maxim AI verdict → Visit Maxim AI
    8.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Maxim AI
  15. Laminar

    Best forTeams needing low-cost agent observability

    A low-cost AI-agent monitoring platform with detailed tracing, debugging, and evaluations.

    • Performance monitoring
    7.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Laminar
  16. Best forTeams needing tracing plus runtime safety controls

    A broad monitoring suite for teams that need tracing, evaluations, guardrails, and cost visibility.

    7.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Fiddler AI
  17. Memoturn

    Best forOpen-source teams wanting a self-hosted monitor

    A self-hosted LLM monitor with tracing, evaluation, prompt management, and automation.

    • Performance monitoring
    7.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit Memoturn
  18. Arthur

    Best forClassical ML teams monitoring fairness and drift

    A flexible monitoring platform for classical ML teams focused on drift and fairness.

    • Bias monitoring
    7.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit Arthur
  19. Best forML teams needing broad quality and bias checks

    Broad drift, performance, data-quality, and bias monitoring with open-source access.

    • Bias monitoring
    7.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Deepchecks
  20. SUPERWISE

    Best forBudget-conscious classical ML monitoring teams

    Broad monitoring and governance coverage for teams that want low monthly entry pricing.

    • Bias monitoring
    7.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit SUPERWISE
  21. NannyML

    Best forTeams monitoring performance without labels

    A flexible monitoring stack for teams that need performance estimates without labels.

    Free plan · 30-day trial Our NannyML verdict → Visit NannyML
    7.3/10★★★★☆
    Visit NannyML
  22. Best forSmall teams monitoring model health affordably

    Affordable model monitoring with core drift, quality, anomaly, and alerting coverage.

    • Drift detection
    • Data quality monitoring
    • Performance monitoring
    7.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit Qualdo-MQX
  23. Pulsar

    Best forSelf-hosted teams monitoring traditional ML metrics

    A focused self-hosted monitor for drift and traditional ML performance.

    Open source Our Pulsar verdict → Visit Pulsar
    6.9/10★★★☆☆
    Visit Pulsar
  24. Lunary

    Best forPaid teams needing basic LLM observability

    A paid toolkit for tracing, evaluating, and improving LLM applications.

    6.6/10★★★☆☆
    Visit Lunary

No tools match those filters.

Compare at a glance

#ToolFree planPaid fromScore
1Arize AXYes$50/mo9.4
2Arize PhoenixYesFree9.3
3W&B WeaveYes$60/mo9.1
4LangfuseYes$29/mo9.0
5OpikYes$19/mo8.9
6LangSmithYes$39/seat/mo8.8
7HoneyHiveYes8.7
8LangWatchYes€29/seat/mo8.6
9HeliconeYes$79/mo8.5
10OpenLITYesFree8.4
11Evidently AIYesFree8.3
12BraintrustYes$249/mo8.2
13GalileoYes$100/mo8.1
14Maxim AIYes$29/seat/mo8.0
15LaminarYes$30/mo7.9
16Fiddler AIYes$0.002/unit usage-based7.8
17MemoturnFree7.7
18ArthurYes$60/mo7.6
19DeepchecksYes7.5
20SUPERWISENo$10/mo7.4
21NannyMLYes$99/mo7.3
22Qualdo-MQXYes$88/mo7.1
23PulsarFree6.9
24LunaryNo$20/user/mo6.6

Explore other topics All topics →

How we rank model monitoring software

Every tool on this page was researched by iTechGuides Editors from its official website — pricing pages, plan tables and product documentation. We rank on how well each one does this category's core job, what the free or entry plan includes, and where it falls short. Where we have enough verified facts, the score out of 10 is a rubric — job fit, value and how much we could verify — shown with its breakdown on every tool's page; a tool we have not verified enough to score yet shows its rank without a number. Scores are re-checked when a product changes its plans. Read the full editorial policy, or submit a tool we missed.

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update