Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Mahad Tahir says a payment-related webhook failed while his server was starting up or being deployed, and he did not realize a customer’s account had failed to activate until the customer contacted him days later. His proposed fix, Webhook Proxy, sits between a webhook provider and an application endpoint to log failed deliveries and let the operator retry them. That account and the product capabilities are Tahir’s descriptions, not independently verified results.
What went wrong in Tahir’s account
In a September 30, 2026 post on DEV Community, Mahad Tahir describes a customer who had paid but did not receive account access. Tahir says a webhook responsible for activation arrived while his server was cold-starting or being deployed, and his endpoint returned an HTTP 500 error or timed out. He says he learned about the missing activation days later, when the customer got in touch.
The important distinction is visibility: Tahir’s story describes a failure that left no useful record in his application, not proof that the payment provider had permanently discarded the event. A missing application log alone does not establish what happened to a provider’s delivery or whether it can be retried.
How Webhook Proxy is supposed to work
Tahir describes Webhook Proxy as a hosted intermediary. Instead of configuring a provider to call an application directly, the user points the provider at the proxy; the proxy then forwards the event to the application’s actual endpoint. The post says it can catch destination 500 responses and timeouts, keep raw JSON payload and error logs, and offer a dashboard action to retry a failed delivery. These are creator-stated features and have not been independently tested here.
#1 Best Overall
- In the provider’s webhook settings, replace the application endpoint URL with the proxy URL. Tahir says this approach requires no SDK or application-code changes, provided the provider lets the user configure a destination URL.
- Configure the proxy to forward events to the application’s real endpoint.
- If forwarding fails, inspect the recorded payload and error information in the proxy dashboard.
- Use the dashboard’s retry action to attempt delivery again, as described by Tahir.
The post names Stripe, Zapier, and Make as examples of services that could send events through this arrangement. That is not a verified compatibility list; confirm that a specific provider supports the needed destination configuration and that the proxy handles its event format and authentication requirements.
Provider settings and the Stripe distinction
Stripe’s Webhook Endpoints API reference documents managing endpoints through the dashboard or API. It describes creating an endpoint with a URL and enabled events, and updating an endpoint’s URL, enabled events, or status. This establishes that the destination can be managed on Stripe’s side; it does not establish delivery-retry timing or behavior.
Rank #2
Before changing a live endpoint, identify which events it receives and where the current URL is configured. Changing the destination alters where new webhook deliveries are sent. The cited Stripe reference does not provide enough information to make claims here about delivery retry schedules, event ordering, signature verification, replay behavior, retention windows, or recommended acknowledgement patterns. For those operational details, consult the relevant current Stripe documentation rather than assuming that a proxy or provider dashboard behaves a particular way.
What a proxy changes—and what it does not
A proxy can add a separate place to inspect and manually retry failures, which is the core benefit Tahir presents. It also adds another service between the provider and the application. If the proxy is unavailable, misconfigured, or unable to forward an event, delivery now depends on that intermediary as well as the application endpoint. The sources do not establish Webhook Proxy’s uptime or resilience.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Tahir frames the hosted service as a lower-maintenance alternative for solo founders to assembling Redis, BullMQ, backoff logic, and a dead-letter queue. That is his positioning, not a universal engineering rule. A self-managed queue may offer more control over automation and throughput, but it also requires someone to operate and monitor it. A provider’s existing dashboard may already be enough for a small workflow, but its visibility and recovery features depend on that provider. Compare the options against the needs of the specific system:
- Recovery: Is retry automatic, or must a person notice the failure and trigger it?
- Volume and throughput: How many events arrive, and how quickly must they be processed? The available sources do not establish a threshold at which one approach becomes preferable.
- Visibility and ownership: Where are failures recorded, who receives alerts, and who is responsible for reviewing or replaying them?
- Provider compatibility: Can the provider be configured to call the intermediary, and does the chosen setup support the required events and authentication?
- Data handling: What payload data is retained, who can access it, and how long is it kept?
- Intermediary resilience: What happens when the proxy itself cannot accept or forward a delivery?
Check payload handling before routing production events
Tahir says Webhook Proxy retains raw JSON payloads. Webhook payloads may contain information about customers or transactions, so inspect the service’s current privacy and security terms, retention policy, access controls, and deletion process before routing production traffic through it. The cited post does not establish the service’s encryption, compliance status, retention period, or access controls; do not assume those protections are present or absent without checking the provider’s current documentation.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.The free-tier claim is dated
Tahir’s September 30, 2026 post advertises a free tier allowing 5,000 webhooks per month without requiring a card. That is a claim in the creator’s post, not independently verified current pricing. Check the live service terms for availability, limits, and conditions before relying on it.
When this approach may fit
A hosted proxy may be worth evaluating when a developer wants a separate delivery log and a straightforward human-triggered retry path without building queue infrastructure. It is less compelling if the current provider already gives adequate visibility and recovery, if failed events need tightly controlled automated processing, or if the organization cannot approve a third party retaining raw payloads. Those are evaluation criteria, not claims about Webhook Proxy’s current capabilities.
Tahir closes his post with a useful operational question: “Genuine question: how are you currently handling failed webhooks — silently retrying and hoping, manually resending from the provider’s dashboard, or something custom?” The answer should include not just how an event is retried, but how a failure is noticed and who owns recovery.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
