Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Spoilers for The Revenant. Hugh Glass kills John Fitzgerald after Fitzgerald murders Glass’s son, Hawk. But the film does not end with a simple victory or a clear sign that Glass has found peace: its final image holds on his look toward the camera and the sound of his breathing, leaving his state of mind unresolved.
What happens to Hugh Glass at the end of The Revenant?
Glass catches up with Fitzgerald and kills him, completing the revenge plot set in motion by Hawk’s murder. The encounter does not undo that loss or turn Glass’s ordeal into an uncomplicated triumph. The final shot instead leaves the viewer with Glass’s face and audible breathing; the film does not establish that he dies or that he has reached peace.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
The Revenant | $9.00 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
The Revenant | $19.32 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
![The Revenant [Blu-ray] [2016]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51KXU8EoAhL._SL160_.jpg)
|
The Revenant [Blu-ray] [2016] | $17.28 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
![The Revenant [Blu-ray] [2016]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51kjRwxw+VL._SL160_.jpg)
|
The Revenant [Blu-ray] [2016] | $24.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
![The Revenant - Der Rückkehrer (+ 4K Ultra HD-Blu-ray) [Alemania] [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51rXL8RB5ML._SL160_.jpg)
|
The Revenant - Der Rückkehrer (+ 4K Ultra HD-Blu-ray) [Alemania] [Blu-ray] | $31.65 | Buy on Amazon |
What does the final look and breath mean?
The ending is open to interpretation. Glass’s breath can suggest that he is still enduring, but it does not settle whether he feels exhaustion, guilt, spiritual change, or anything else. Den of Geek connects the breath to the film’s earlier insistence that a person keep fighting while they can still breathe, a reading that makes survival—not a clean emotional resolution—the ending’s through line: Den of Geek’s ending analysis.
Director Alejandro González Iñárritu described the film as a spiritual drama and spoke of Glass becoming “a man, a beast, a saint, a martyr, a spirit.” That framing supports a spiritual reading of the journey, but it does not supply a definitive explanation of the last look. The film leaves its precise meaning with the viewer, as Iñárritu’s interview with The Guardian makes clear.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors#1 Best Overall
- After a 19th-century fur trapper gets mauled by a grizzly bear, he's robbed and left for dead by his companions. He survives and seeks revenge on them.
How does the film’s ending differ from Hugh Glass’s history?
The film uses a real survival episode as its starting point, then reshapes the people, season, and outcome into a revenge story. Historical accounts describe Glass surviving a bear mauling during an 1823 fur-trading expedition after being left behind. They do not establish the film’s Hawk-centered motive or its revenge killing.
| Element | In the film | In the historical accounts |
|---|---|---|
| Glass’s son, Hawk | Hawk is Glass’s son, and Fitzgerald murders him, giving Glass a personal reason to seek revenge. | The Guardian’s historical account and the Hugh Glass Society report no evidence for the son portrayed in the film. The Guardian; Hugh Glass Society. |
| Fitzgerald’s fate | Glass kills Fitzgerald. | The Hugh Glass Society says Glass eventually caught up with Fitzgerald but did not kill him; The Guardian likewise distinguishes the film’s revenge from the historical account. Hugh Glass Society; The Guardian. |
| Season and journey | The ordeal unfolds amid a sustained snowy winter landscape. | The reported trek ran from August to October, rather than through the film’s continuous winter setting. The Guardian. |
| Survival ordeal | Glass survives a bear attack, abandonment, and a journey back to his former companions. | The bear mauling and abandonment have a historical basis, but the details come through a secondhand account, not a diary written by Glass. The Guardian. |
How reliable is the familiar story of the real Hugh Glass?
Glass did not leave a first-person written account. A version of his story was published by another writer in Philadelphia’s The Port Folio in 1825 and may have been embellished. That means the survival episode is grounded in history, but fine-grained details should be treated as reported tradition rather than a record in Glass’s own words. The distinction matters: a historical kernel does not make the film’s invented family drama or revenge ending historical fact.
Rank #2
- After a 19th-century fur trapper gets mauled by a grizzly bear, he's robbed and left for dead by his companions. He survives and seeks revenge on them.
Iñárritu described the screenplay’s historical basis this way: “The only thing that the script took, really, was the name and the central anecdote: that Glass was attacked by a bear, he was taken care of, abandoned, and then took this nearly 200-mile journey in the winter. That’s really the only historical fact—a lot of his story is built on legend.” This is the director’s description of the film’s source material, not a historian’s certification of every detail. Film Comment’s interview with Iñárritu.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- The disk has English audio and subtitles.
Rank #4
Rank #3
- The disk has English audio.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Recommended Free Tools
