What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
IBM acquired SoftLayer to add a large, automated infrastructure platform to its enterprise cloud portfolio. The deal closed on July 3, 2013, for $1.977 billion in cash, giving IBM stronger public-cloud infrastructure alongside its existing private- and hybrid-cloud services.
What happened in the IBM-SoftLayer deal?
IBM announced a definitive agreement on June 4, 2013. The acquisition closed on July 3 after customary regulatory and other approvals. IBM then placed SoftLayer in a new cloud services division alongside IBM SmartCloud.
SoftLayer was headquartered in Dallas and provided on-demand dedicated servers, virtual cloud servers and private clouds. IBM’s announcement FAQ described 21,000 customers worldwide. A contemporaneous Reuters account reported 25,000 customers, so those figures should be treated as source-specific counts rather than combined into one total.
How much did IBM pay for SoftLayer?
IBM’s announcement did not disclose the purchase price. IBM’s later SEC accounting disclosure recorded consideration of $1.977 billion in cash for 100% of SoftLayer. That is the most precise reported transaction value, and it should not be confused with an announcement-day estimate.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →#1 Best Overall
Why did IBM buy SoftLayer?
IBM said enterprise customers wanted a trusted provider that could offer public, private and hybrid cloud options with reliability, security and centralized management. SoftLayer gave IBM a ready-made public infrastructure platform instead of requiring the company to build that capability from scratch.
IBM’s 2013 annual report described the intended combination as the “security, privacy and reliability of private clouds” with “the economy and speed of a public cloud.” In practical terms, the acquisition was meant to broaden IBM’s cloud choices for customers that did not want to choose exclusively between an isolated private environment and a commodity public cloud.
The strategic case also reflected a market shift. Amazon Web Services, Rackspace, Microsoft and other providers were competing for infrastructure workloads, while IBM’s traditional strength was enterprise software, services and managed infrastructure. SoftLayer was intended to give IBM a more credible infrastructure foundation for that competition.
Rank #2
What did SoftLayer add to IBM Cloud?
Infrastructure choices beyond virtual machines
SoftLayer’s portfolio included dedicated bare-metal servers, virtual cloud servers and private clouds. That combination mattered for workloads that needed consistent physical performance, specialized configurations or isolation, as well as for customers comfortable with virtual machines.
Automation and programmable operations
Gartner analyst Lydia Leong identified SoftLayer’s “secret sauce” as an automation platform that handled virtualized and non-virtualized servers with largely equal ease. The platform’s value proposition included hourly billing for bare metal, automated provisioning, image-based deployment, APIs and a graphical interface. Those controls made physical infrastructure behave more like an on-demand cloud resource.
Workloads IBM targeted
IBM characterized SoftLayer as an infrastructure-as-a-service platform for performance-intensive mobile, social, gaming and analytics workloads. The offering therefore extended IBM’s reach from managed enterprise environments into workloads that often demand rapid provisioning and predictable infrastructure performance.
Rank #3
The Tomcat performance claim
IBM’s FAQ said a Tomcat test was almost 10 times faster than Amazon’s EC2 small instance and about 30 to 40 percent faster than Amazon’s high-CPU model. This was an IBM-supplied comparison reproduced in the FAQ, not an independently reproduced benchmark. It is evidence of IBM’s sales positioning, not a general performance result that applies to every workload or configuration.
Was the IBM-SoftLayer deal a good deal?
The strongest way to assess the transaction is to separate strategic fit, technical differentiation, price and execution.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
| Assessment axis | Evidence supporting the deal | Risk or qualification |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic fit | SoftLayer supplied public-cloud infrastructure that complemented IBM’s private-cloud, hybrid-cloud and enterprise services portfolio. | IBM still had to convert infrastructure capacity into durable customer adoption and profitable cloud services in a market led by larger established competitors. |
| Technical differentiation | Automation covered bare-metal and virtualized servers, with API and GUI provisioning, image deployment and hourly bare-metal billing. | The headline Tomcat comparison was IBM’s own claim and does not establish a universal advantage. |
| Price | IBM paid $1.977 billion in cash, while Wells Fargo analyst Gray Powell estimated the value at 11.1 times SoftLayer’s projected 2013 EBITDA. | The 11.1-times figure was an analyst estimate based on projected EBITDA, not a reported purchase-accounting multiple or a guarantee of returns. |
| Execution | IBM soon reported expanding cloud revenue and committed major capital to enlarge SoftLayer’s data-center network. | Early revenue and capacity figures show momentum, but they do not by themselves prove the acquisition’s long-term return on investment. |
Contemporaneous analyst reaction reflected that balance. ISI Group’s Brian Marshall called the transaction strategically solid because it strengthened IBM’s position in higher-growth cloud services and offered an alternative to established vendors. At the same time, commentary emphasized execution and valuation risk: IBM had paid a substantial price to compete in a fast-moving infrastructure market.
What happened after the acquisition?
First reported cloud results
IBM’s third-quarter 2013 Form 10-Q said the acquisition “significantly improves” its public- and hybrid-cloud capabilities. IBM reported more than $1 billion of cloud revenue in that quarter, including approximately $460 million from cloud-delivered services and solutions. It also said cloud revenue had risen more than 70 percent through the first three quarters compared with the prior year.
These are IBM-reported revenue categories from 2013; the quarterly total, the cloud-delivered-services figure and the year-to-date growth rate describe different scopes and should not be added together.
Investment in SoftLayer capacity
In 2014, IBM committed $1.2 billion to expand SoftLayer data centers. IBM said the plan would double the centers and bring the network to 40 cloud data centers in 15 countries. That investment showed IBM was treating SoftLayer as a core infrastructure platform rather than a small tuck-in acquisition.
Best Value
- From the acclaimed, award-winning author of Alexander Hamilton: here is the essential, endlessly engrossing biography of John D. Rockefeller, Sr.—the Jekyll-and-Hyde of American capitalism.
- In the course of his nearly 98 years, Rockefeller was known as both a rapacious robber baron, whose Standard Oil Company rode roughshod over an industry, and a philanthropist who donated money lavishly to universities and medical centers.
- He was the terror of his competitors, the bogeyman of reformers, the delight of caricaturists—and an utter enigma.
Annual-revenue perspective
IBM’s 2013 annual report reported $4.4 billion in cloud-based-solutions revenue and credited SoftLayer with enabling offerings that combined private-cloud control with public-cloud economics and speed. Because IBM’s annual cloud-based-solutions category is broader than the quarterly figures above, it is not a directly comparable measure of SoftLayer revenue alone.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the evidence does—and does not—show
- The transaction clearly addressed a strategic gap: IBM needed scalable public infrastructure to complete its private- and hybrid-cloud story.
- SoftLayer’s automation, APIs and bare-metal provisioning were meaningful technical differentiators at a time when many cloud services centered primarily on virtual machines.
- IBM’s early revenue reports and $1.2 billion expansion plan indicate rapid follow-through after closing.
- No durable, independently comparable market-share figure establishes how much the acquisition changed IBM’s position against Amazon Web Services, Rackspace, Microsoft or other providers.
- The available figures do not establish SoftLayer’s standalone profitability after integration or the acquisition’s ultimate return on invested capital.
Analysts’ take
IBM-SoftLayer was strategically coherent and technically relevant: IBM bought infrastructure, automation and global expansion capacity that its enterprise cloud strategy needed. The $1.977 billion cash price and the analyst-estimated 11.1-times projected-EBITDA valuation made execution important, but IBM’s early post-close revenue disclosures and data-center investment support the view that the company acted decisively on the deal’s rationale. The evidence supports calling it a strong strategic move with meaningful execution risk, not proving a final financial verdict.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
