Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Xceptance LoadTest review

Free#20 of 37 in Performance Testing Software

A Java-focused open-source suite for browser, API, distributed, and CI performance testing.

7.4/10Editor score
Xceptance LoadTest7.4 Visit Xceptance

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Xceptance LoadTest (XLT) is an open-source load and performance testing tool for software development teams, with a particular fit for Java-based engineering groups. Tests can be written in Java and JUnit, then run locally, across distributed machines, or on cloud machines. XLT covers both HTTP request-level API performance testing and real-browser testing through WebDriver, Chrome, and Firefox. It runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, and self-hosted infrastructure, with deployment options spanning local environments and cloud machines.

Its strongest differentiator is the breadth of testing and load-generation controls in one Java-oriented tool. Teams can configure user-count and arrival-rate load models, generate load across machines and cloud environments, and produce HTML, comparison, and trend reports. The result browser supports diagnostics, while real-time monitoring connects with Graphite and Grafana. Integrations with Maven, Gradle, JUnit, WebDriver, AWS, and Google Cloud extend its fit across development, execution, and monitoring workflows. Jenkins integration also supports CI/CD use.

XLT is distributed under the Apache License 2.0 and has a free plan, making it suitable for teams that want open-source performance testing without paid plan selection. The trade-off is its Java and JUnit-centered approach: teams seeking a scripting experience outside that ecosystem may find the fit less direct. It also requires a supported JDK and the operational capability to manage local or distributed execution environments. Choose XLT when browser testing, API testing, scalable load generation, and Java integration matter together; consider an alternative when a packaged commercial plan structure or a different primary scripting ecosystem is the priority.

Xceptance LoadTest pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports real-browser tests with WebDriver, Chrome, and Firefox
    • Runs distributed load generation across machines and cloud environments
    • Combines reports, diagnostics, monitoring, and Jenkins integration
  • Where it doesn't
    • Test scripting is centered on Java and JUnit
    • Requires a supported JDK across supported deployment environments
    • No paid tiers are available for teams seeking packaged plans

Xceptance LoadTest fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update