Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Webber review

#27 of 27 in Web Debugging Proxies

A focused desktop proxy for recording, filtering, throttling, and inspecting web traffic.

6.5/10Editor score
Webber6.5 Visit Webber

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Webber is a paid desktop web-debugging proxy from CrossAPI for developers who need to observe how applications exchange HTTP and HTTPS traffic. It records traffic between a client and the internet, then provides inspection of requests, responses, and headers. Filtering helps narrow recorded sessions, while a configurable local HTTP proxy port supports proxy-based workflows. This makes Webber a fit for users whose main requirement is straightforward capture and analysis rather than a broad interactive debugging suite.

Webber uses a one-time license model. The displayed starting price is 9.95, and the Webber License is valid for all Webber V1 series. Volume license plans cover 2–9, 10–24, 25–49, and 50+ licenses, with volume discounts attached to each tier. The application is listed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, with official downloads for Windows, Mac, and Debian/Ubuntu systems. The published workflow also includes configuration guidance for mobile devices, browsers, and local HTTP proxy clients, giving teams several ways to route traffic through the desktop proxy.

The strongest case for Webber is controlled traffic analysis. Latency simulation and bandwidth throttling let developers model slower network conditions, while HAR export supports later performance analysis. HTTPS monitoring through an SSL proxy extends the same inspection workflow to encrypted traffic. Its stated scope is narrower than a full web-debugging workbench: editing, replay, mocking, breakpoints, and WebSockets are not part of the documented positioning. Choose Webber when recording, filtering, inspecting, throttling, and exporting HTTP/HTTPS sessions cover the need. Choose an alternative when debugging depends on changing requests, replaying them, creating mocks, pausing execution, or examining WebSocket traffic.

Webber pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Records and inspects HTTP/HTTPS requests, responses, and headers
    • Simulates latency and bandwidth limits for network-condition analysis
    • Exports HAR files and supports SSL proxy monitoring
  • Where it doesn't
    • Paid product with no free plan
    • Focuses on recording and inspection rather than interactive debugging
    • Teams needing WebSocket workflows should consider alternatives

Webber fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update