Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Turf review

#42 of 59 in Customer Feedback SoftwareCustomer Community SoftwareForum HostingCommunity Platforms

A broad community hub for feedback, documentation, roadmaps, and customer discussions.

5.3/10Editor score
Turf5.3 Visit Turf

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Turf is a customer community platform for SaaS companies that brings feedback, ideation, documentation, and customer communication into one environment. Its feature set covers feedback boards, feature requests with voting and comments, roadmap discussions, bug reports with descriptions, screenshots, and video recordings, changelogs, forums, knowledge bases, technical documentation hubs, polls, surveys, analytics, and moderation workflows. Branded community environments can be hosted on a customer domain, with options such as in-app widgets, SSO, custom authentication pages, private channels, and member segmentation.

The published plans show two contact-sales tiers. Business includes unlimited members, 3 admin seats, 20 channels, 10,000 monthly email credits, 25GB of data storage, and customer feedback and ideation boards. Enterprise adds 5+ admin seats, unlimited channels, unlimited email credits, 50GB+ of data storage, and an in-app widget. Turf does not offer a free plan, so it is better suited to teams evaluating a paid community and feedback program rather than users seeking a self-serve entry point. The plan structure makes the Enterprise tier more relevant for organizations that need broader channel access, higher communication capacity, or embedded product feedback.

Turf’s main strength is breadth: it can connect customer conversations to feature voting, roadmap visibility, release announcements, documentation, bug collection, and community discussion. It supports web and API access, with integrations covering CRM systems, knowledge bases, chat support widgets, product boards, the API, and webhooks. That makes it a fit for SaaS teams building a community or documentation hub around an existing customer-facing stack. Teams that need a narrow feedback portal, public pricing, or more specifically defined integrations should compare alternatives before choosing Turf.

Turf pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Combines feedback boards, roadmaps, bug reports, and changelogs
    • Supports forums, knowledge bases, widgets, analytics, and surveys
    • Offers voting, comments, media-rich bug reports, and moderation workflows
  • Where it doesn't
    • Pricing is available through contact-sales plans
    • Business limits channels, admin seats, credits, and storage
    • Integration details are less specific than some alternatives

Turf fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update