Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Best Tungstenic Alternatives in 2026

#18 of 21 in Mobile Application Security Testing Software

The top Tungstenic alternatives are Appknox, Ostorlab and NowSecure Platform: 15 mobile application security testing software our editors would look at instead of Tungstenic, in our ranking order.

7.3/10Editor score
Tungstenic7.3 Visit Tungstenic

Tungstenic: Automated Android and iOS testing with exploitation confirmation and remediation retesting. Where it falls short: focused on android and iOS application binaries.

Switching from Tungstenic? For most mobile application security testing software buyers the best Tungstenic alternative is Appknox, built for organizations wanting broad hybrid mobile testing. On a budget, Silker AI Mobile Security starts at $31/mo. Ostorlab has a free plan. Mobexa offers the most included apps (2).

Why People Look for a Tungstenic Alternative

  • Focused on Android and iOS application binaries
  • Contact-sales pricing provides no upfront plan comparison
  • Web platform access may not suit teams seeking another deployment model

Quick Picks by What You Need

All 15 Tungstenic Alternatives, Ranked

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

  1. Appknox

    Best forOrganizations wanting broad hybrid mobile testing

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 9.4 vs 7.3

    Broad hybrid testing for teams securing mobile apps across the development lifecycle.

    • Sensitive-data flow
    • Dynamic app analysis
    Pricing on request Our Appknox verdict → Visit Appknox
    9.4/10★★★★★
    Visit Appknox
  2. Ostorlab

    Best forTeams seeking broad freemium mobile AppSec

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 9.3 vs 7.3

    Broad mobile AppSec coverage with freemium entry and cloud delivery.

    • Sensitive-data flow
    • Dynamic app analysis
    9.3/10★★★★★
    Visit Ostorlab
  3. Best forMature teams needing deep runtime assurance

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 9.2 vs 7.3

    Deep mobile runtime and binary analysis for teams securing release pipelines.

    9.2/10★★★★★
    Visit NowSecure
  4. Best forTeams needing broad testing and protection validation

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 9.0 vs 7.3

    Broad mobile security coverage for teams validating apps, components, and runtime protections.

    • Dynamic app analysis
    Pricing on request · 30-day trial Our Zimperium zScan verdict → Visit Zimperium
    9.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Zimperium
  5. Quokka

    Best forBinary-first enterprise mobile AppSec

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 8.9 vs 7.3

    Binary-first mobile AppSec with deep analysis, broad integrations, and contact-sales pricing.

    • Sensitive-data flow
    • Dynamic app analysis
    Pricing on request · 30-day trial Our Quokka verdict → Visit Quokka
    8.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Quokka
  6. Best forCompliance-focused mobile security programs

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 8.8 vs 7.3

    A compliance-focused platform covering mobile code, runtime behavior, libraries, and releases.

    • Dynamic app analysis
    8.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Data Theorem
  7. AppSweep

    Best forBudget-conscious teams needing both analysis types

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 8.7 vs 7.3

    A cloud-based mobile security scanner with broad analysis and CI/CD support.

    • Sensitive-data flow
    • Dynamic app analysis
    8.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit AppSweep
  8. Mobexa

    Best forSmall teams needing hybrid controls and exports

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 8.6 vs 7.3

    A hybrid mobile security platform with broad analysis, evidence, exports and enterprise controls.

    • Sensitive-data flow
    • Dynamic app analysis
    8.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit Mobexa
  9. Best forTeams needing evidence-rich attack-path testing

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 8.5 vs 7.3

    Evidence-rich Android and iOS security testing for development and security teams.

    • Sensitive-data flow
    • Dynamic app analysis
    8.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Oversecured
  10. Best forTeams using Corellium-based workflows

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 8.4 vs 7.3

    A focused iOS and Android testing workflow for Corellium-based security teams.

    • Sensitive-data flow
    • Dynamic app analysis
    8.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit Corellium
  11. Best forSmall teams wanting affordable guided checks

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 8.2 vs 7.3

    Affordable guided checks for iOS and Android, with API protection beyond static assessment.

    8.2/10★★★★☆
    Visit Silker AI
  12. Best forTeams wanting low-cost per-scan coverage

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 8.1 vs 7.3

    Low-cost per-scan mobile security testing with static and dynamic coverage.

    • Sensitive-data flow
    • Dynamic app analysis
    8.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit Quixxi Scan
  13. Q-mast

    Best forEstablished teams needing standards-based analysis

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 8.0 vs 7.3

    A broad, standards-focused testing suite for established mobile security teams.

    • Sensitive-data flow
    • Dynamic app analysis
    Pricing on request Our Q-mast verdict → Visit Quokka
    8.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Quokka
  14. Best forTeams prioritizing deep static MASVS coverage

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 7.9 vs 7.3

    Deep static MASVS coverage for teams building repeatable mobile security evidence.

    7.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit WASViking
  15. Best forOpen-source users needing advanced Android analysis

    • Better than Tungstenic:
    • Editor score 7.7 vs 7.3

    Open-source Android analysis with deep reverse-engineering features and limited integrations.

    • Sensitive-data flow
    • Dynamic app analysis
    7.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit Reversense

Tungstenic Alternatives: Common Questions

What is the best alternative to Tungstenic?

Appknox: #1 in our Mobile Application Security Testing Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.4 out of 10. Broad hybrid testing for teams securing mobile apps across the development lifecycle.

Is there a free alternative to Tungstenic?

Yes. Ostorlab, AppSweep, Silker AI Mobile Security, Quixxi Scan and Reversense Security have a free plan or a free tier.

Why do people look for Tungstenic alternatives?

Focused on Android and iOS application binaries; Contact-sales pricing provides no upfront plan comparison; Web platform access may not suit teams seeking another deployment model.

Which Tungstenic alternative has the most included apps?

Mobexa, with 2.

How do I switch from Tungstenic?

Export your data from Tungstenic (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Tungstenic.

How to Switch from Tungstenic

  1. Export your data from Tungstenic (most tools have an export in their settings).
  2. Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
  3. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
  4. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Tungstenic.

Tungstenic vs Each Alternative

#ToolFree planPaid fromMobile platformsStatic binary analysisDynamic app analysisSensitive-data flowScore
18TungstenicBothYesYes7.3
1AppknoxNoBothYesYesYes9.4
2OstorlabYesBothYesYesYes9.3
3NowSecure Platform9.2
4Zimperium zScanNoBothYesYes9.0
5QuokkaBothYesYesYes8.9
6Data Theorem Mobile SecureBothYesYes8.8
7AppSweepYesBothYesYesYes8.7
8MobexaNo€2,346/yrBothYesYesYes8.6
9OversecuredNo$1,000/unit/moBothYesYesYes8.5
10Corellium MATRIXNoBothYesYesYes8.4
11Silker AI Mobile SecurityYes$31/moBothYesNo8.2
12Quixxi ScanYes$499/site/yrBothYesYesYes8.1
13Q-mastBothYesYesYes8.0
14WASViking Mobile Security AssessmentBothYesNo7.9
15Reversense SecurityYesBothYesYesYes7.7

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update