Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

ThreatZ review

#10 of 24 in Threat Modeling Software

A broad automotive threat modeling suite for enterprises managing assurance across complex programs.

8.4/10Editor score
ThreatZ8.4 Visit ThreatZ

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

ThreatZ is an automotive cybersecurity engineering platform for OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers. It brings system and vehicle architecture modeling, TARA, attack-path analysis, risk assessment, SBOM management, vulnerability monitoring, security assurance, incident management and compliance reporting into one knowledge graph. Its scope suits organizations that need connected workflows across vehicle programs, suppliers and security evidence rather than a narrow threat modeling tool.

Pricing is organized into Team, Professional and Enterprise. Team costs $1,199 per month with annual billing, or $14,388 per year with annual billing, and includes TARA, a system modeling canvas, attack trees, risk assessment, security assurance chains, compliance work products and an AI Assistant. Professional costs $499 per user per month with annual billing and adds security blueprints and automation, risk traceability and baselines, AI recommendations, SBOM management, CVE matching, MFA, RBAC and shared evidence workflows. Enterprise adds program and vehicle modeling, fleet mapping, incident command, supplier workspaces, SSO/SAML, API access, on-premise or air-gap deployment and custom compliance templates.

ThreatZ also fits environments with established engineering and security toolchains. Integrations include Vector CANoe, MATLAB System Composer, Atlassian Jira, GitHub, SonarQube, IBM DOORS, Siemens Polarion, PTC Integrity, CodeQL, Semgrep, CycloneDX, SPDX, NVD, CNVD and OSV. The web and API platform supports hosted private-cloud deployments, while Enterprise extends deployment control. Choose ThreatZ when automotive assurance, traceability, supplier collaboration and compliance outputs must connect across a broad program. Teams seeking a smaller, lower-cost tool for a limited number of projects should look elsewhere.

ThreatZ pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Combines TARA, attack paths, risk assessment, SBOM and compliance work products
    • Connects with Jira, GitHub, DOORS, Polarion, CodeQL and vulnerability databases
    • Supports hosted private cloud, on-premise and air-gapped deployments
  • Where it doesn't
    • Team is limited to three projects
    • No free plan is available
    • Professional pricing is charged per user per month

ThreatZ fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update