Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

ThreatLocker review

#13 of 28 in Endpoint Protection PlatformsEndpoint Security Software

A control-focused endpoint platform for teams prioritizing application allowlisting.

7.9/10Editor score
ThreatLocker7.9 Visit ThreatLocker

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

ThreatLocker is a cloud-based Zero Trust security platform for organizations managing endpoints, servers, applications, networks, and data. It is designed for businesses, managed service providers, and enterprises that want tighter control over software execution, privileges, devices, and network activity. Its central approach is deny-by-default application allowlisting, supported by application ringfencing, behavioral containment, endpoint and server firewall controls, device restrictions, patch management, and managed detection and response.

The platform’s main strength is the breadth of its control layer. Real-time EDR detection can trigger automated device isolation, while application ringfencing contains behavior and centralized policy management gives administrators a shared place to configure endpoints and servers. Privileged access management, external storage and USB controls, exploit blocking, behavioral protection, and server protection extend the platform beyond basic malware detection. Teams can also connect ThreatLocker with ConnectWise, Kaseya, SolarWinds, Datto, SIEM platforms, SOAR platforms, and the REST API. A 30-day trial provides an evaluation period, while published pricing is based on contacting sales rather than selecting a listed plan.

ThreatLocker fits organizations that value prevention through explicit application control and want endpoint, server, and operational security features in one platform. It may also suit MSPs and security teams that need integrations with service-management, SIEM, or SOAR environments. The trade-off is platform scope: the documented operating-system coverage is Windows and macOS, so teams requiring Linux endpoint support should consider alternatives. Deployment also includes a required local endpoint agent in addition to the cloud console. Choose ThreatLocker when controlled execution and policy enforcement are priorities; look elsewhere when broader operating-system coverage or publicly listed pricing is essential.

ThreatLocker pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Deny-by-default allowlisting limits unauthorized software execution.
    • Combines EDR, device isolation, firewall, device control, and patch management.
    • Supports MSP, SIEM, SOAR, REST API, and major PSA integrations.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Coverage is limited to Windows and macOS.
    • Pricing requires contacting sales for a custom plan.
    • The local endpoint agent is required alongside the cloud console.

ThreatLocker fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update