Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Storj review

#19 of 150 in Object Storage ServicesDecentralized Storage ServicesSecure Cloud Storage

A focused object storage service for distributed data and S3-compatible workflows.

7.5/10Editor score
Storj7.5 Visit Storj

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Storj provides cloud object storage for organizations managing backups, media, AI data, and other large files. Its hosted service offers an S3-compatible REST API and gateway, while Gateway ST supports self-hosted deployments. Data is split and distributed across a global network using erasure coding rather than conventional regional replication. That positioning makes Storj a strong fit for teams seeking distributed storage with S3 access, versioning, retention controls, and support for large objects.

The pricing structure has a 30-day free trial with 25 GB of free storage, S3-compatible app support, and no credit card required. The Standard plan costs $7 per TB per month and provides globally distributed storage with $7/TB egress. Advanced costs $10 per TB per month and adds region-specific storage, while also listing U.S. SOC 2 Type 2 compliant data centers and $7/TB egress. The paid tiers therefore separate global placement from region-specific placement, giving buyers a direct choice between the two storage models.

Storj’s feature set is strongest around object controls and S3-oriented workflows. Object versioning, Object Lock with governance, compliance, and legal hold modes, object-level TTL expiration, and multipart uploads address retention and large-file management. Integrations include Amazon S3-compatible clients, Rclone, Veeam, and Google Cloud Pub/Sub for bucket event notifications. Teams that need conventional replication scope or AWS lifecycle configuration may prefer another service: Storj’s S3 API does not support AWS PutBucketLifecycleConfiguration, and its lifecycle behavior uses Storj-specific TTL controls. Choose Storj for erasure-coded distribution and focused object storage; look elsewhere when regional replication is central.

Storj pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • S3-compatible REST API, gateway, and broad client support
    • Erasure-coded global distribution for large files and backups
    • Versioning, Object Lock, TTLs, and multipart uploads
  • Where it doesn't
    • No replication scope for conventional regional replication workflows
    • Advanced storage costs more than Standard
    • Lifecycle configuration differs from AWS S3 workflows

Storj fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update