Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Squash TM review

Freemium#5 of 48 in Test Management Software

A broad open-source test management suite, with paid pricing aimed at larger deployments.

8.9/10Editor score
Squash TM8.9 Visit Squash TM

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Squash TM is a test management platform for QA teams coordinating manual, exploratory, BDD, and automated testing. Its shared repositories cover requirements, test cases, and Gherkin-based assets, while traceability connects requirements to tests. Teams can plan campaigns, track execution, manage exploratory testing sessions, collect automated results, and review dashboards, indicators, and customizable reports. It is available as a free Community edition, commercial Server editions, and hosted Cloud editions, with web, Windows, Linux, and self-hosted options.

The pricing structure makes the Community edition the main entry point. It is free and includes test asset management plus GitLab and Jira integrations. The Premium package starts at €2,000 per annual package, with the listed annual price excluding tax; Server pricing varies by declared users. The paid tier is therefore oriented toward organizations that need a commercial deployment and can justify a larger annual commitment, rather than teams seeking a low-cost per-user subscription. For open-source teams with substantial test operations, the free edition offers a practical way to organize a broad QA process before considering paid deployment.

Squash TM fits ecosystems built around Jira, GitLab, Mantis, Bugzilla, Azure DevOps, Redmine, or Tuleap. Automation and delivery workflows can connect through Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Cucumber, Robot Framework, Playwright, Cypress, JUnit/TestNG, and Postman/Newman, while the REST API supports asset updates and administration. That breadth suits teams managing requirements, test runs, reporting, and automated results in one system. Smaller teams focused mainly on lightweight test scheduling may find the scope and Premium price harder to justify; teams with varied testing methods and integration needs are the stronger match.

Squash TM pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Free Community edition with core test asset management
    • Covers requirements, execution, exploratory testing, reporting, and traceability
    • Integrates with Jira, GitLab, CI/CD tools, and major test frameworks
  • Where it doesn't
    • Premium starts at €2,000 annually, excluding tax
    • Server pricing varies by declared users
    • Its breadth may exceed the needs of simple scheduling teams

Squash TM fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update