Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Skooner review

Free#45 of 53 in Kubernetes Monitoring

Open-source Kubernetes management with live metrics, resource views, and cluster actions.

4.6/10Editor score
Skooner4.6 Visit Skooner

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Skooner is an open-source, web-based dashboard for operators who need to inspect and manage Kubernetes clusters. It provides resource views for namespaces, nodes, pods, deployments, storage, and RBAC, alongside real-time cluster metrics and health charts. CRUD and scaling operations, an inline YAML editor with API documentation, and a responsive interface for phones and tablets make it suited to teams managing their own Kubernetes environments through a browser.

Its pricing model is open source rather than a tiered commercial service. The product is deployed inside a Kubernetes cluster from vendor-provided YAML, with ingress and NodePort options for exposure. Kubernetes and metrics-server form the core platform fit, while OpenID Connect integration supports authentication. Teams should expect a self-hosted deployment model and should assess their existing Kubernetes access and identity setup before adopting it.

Skooner’s strongest focus is direct cluster resource management: operators can inspect status, view health information, edit YAML, perform CRUD actions, and scale workloads from one interface. It is a practical choice for teams that want an open-source dashboard for day-to-day Kubernetes resource work. It is less suitable for organizations seeking a broader observability system, because log collection, distributed tracing, alert notifications, managed Kubernetes services, and control-plane monitoring are outside its documented scope. Choose Skooner when resource administration and self-hosting are the priority; choose another product when monitoring workflows must extend into those areas.

Skooner pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Real-time cluster metrics and health charts
    • CRUD, scaling, and inline YAML editing
    • OIDC authentication with RBAC-aware access
  • Where it doesn't
    • No log collection or distributed tracing
    • No alert notifications or retention periods
    • Requires self-hosted deployment inside Kubernetes

Skooner fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update