Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Silo review

Free#18 of 23 in Build Cache Software

A focused, free Gradle cache server with strong administration and retention controls.

7.3/10Editor score
Silo7.3 Visit Silo

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Silo is a self-hosted HTTP server implementing the Gradle build cache protocol. It is intended for teams that want to operate a remote build cache themselves without an account or paid subscription. The project supports Linux and web access, stores cached content on the filesystem, and is distributed as a multi-architecture Docker image or a fat JAR. Its focus is deliberately narrow: Gradle teams that need control over cache deployment and administration rather than a multi-build-system cache service.

Silo’s strongest area is cache management. Administrators can configure LRU eviction with TTL, byte, entry-count, and free-space limits, helping define how the filesystem-backed cache behaves as it grows. HTTP Basic and OIDC/Bearer authentication are available, with read-only and read-write role mapping for access control. Atomic content-addressed writes and SQLite metadata support the storage design, while Prometheus metrics, health endpoints, and JSON-structured logging provide operational visibility. A retro-terminal web administration dashboard adds a browser-based management surface.

The pricing model is straightforward: Silo is free and open source. There are no paid tiers to compare, while deployment remains the team’s responsibility through Docker or the fat JAR. The main trade-off is platform breadth. Gradle is the only supported integration and build system, so teams standardizing on other build tools should choose a broader alternative. Silo is also described as alpha software, which makes it a better fit for technically capable administrators comfortable operating a focused, self-hosted service than for organizations seeking a mature, managed cache product.

Silo pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Free, open-source remote cache with no account requirement
    • Authentication, role mapping, retention limits, metrics, and health endpoints
    • Docker and fat JAR distribution with a web administration dashboard
  • Where it doesn't
    • Supports Gradle rather than multiple build systems
    • Alpha software may not suit teams requiring mature tooling
    • Self-hosting requires infrastructure and operational ownership

Silo fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update