Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Silk Test review

#34 of 37 in Automated Testing

A broad cross-platform test suite for teams managing varied application technologies.

6.7/10Editor score
Visit OpenText
Silk Test6.7 Visit OpenText

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Silk Test brings functional and regression testing for web, mobile, rich-client, desktop, and enterprise applications into one suite. Its cross-browser coverage, mobile support for native, web, and hybrid apps, and support for applications including SAP and Oracle Forms make it relevant to quality and development teams with varied technology estates. Business teams can author tests visually through workflow and logic wizards, while developers can write scripts in Java, .NET, or 4Test. This breadth is most useful where test coverage spans platforms; teams focused on a single web application may find a narrower tool easier to match to their needs.

Test creation and execution offer both low-code and code-based paths. Silk Test supports portable scripts and Selenium script reuse for browser testing, plus mobile runs on physical devices, simulators, and emulators. Parallel execution can help teams run suites across targets, and Silk4J tests can run in Docker or be triggered from CI servers. Integrations include Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity, Git, SVN, Eclipse, Visual Studio, Silk Central, Silk Performer, Mobile Center, and Sauce Labs. That ecosystem suits organizations already using these tools, while setup and script maintenance will still require choices about languages, targets, and execution environments.

According to OpenText’s community page, the evaluation period is 30 days; pricing is contact-sales, with no free plan. The product is self-hosted and fits mid-market and enterprise teams, so buyers should account for operating the environment as well as licensing discussions. Documentation and community are the listed support channels. Choose Silk Test when a team needs functional suites spanning browsers, mobile devices, and enterprise applications, and values combining visual authoring with scripting and CI workflows. It is less suitable for teams seeking a free starting tier, hosted deployment, or a focused tool for a single platform.

Silk Test pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Visual no-code authoring sits alongside Java, .NET, and 4Test scripting.
    • Tests web browsers, iOS, Android, desktop, and enterprise applications.
    • Parallel execution, Selenium reuse, and CI-server triggers support test workflows.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Pricing is handled through sales rather than a published entry plan.
    • Self-hosted deployment may not suit teams seeking a hosted testing service.
    • The feature breadth may exceed the needs of teams focused on one application type.

Silk Test fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update