Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Signo review

Free#25 of 28 in Code Signing Software

A focused open-source API signer for Linux teams using hardware-backed keys.

6.5/10Editor score
Signo6.5 Visit Signo

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Signo is an open-source, self-hosted Node.js service for teams that need API-driven code signing on a Linux machine. It supports plain file signing and Authenticode signing for Windows executables, making it suited to small teams automating signing workflows or incorporating hardware-backed keys into CI/CD processes. Administrators can manage multiple users and API signees while controlling access to the signing service through HMAC-signed API requests.

Its main distinction is the combination of HTTP signing and PKCS#11 support. Signo can detect and manage PKCS#11 tokens, expose hardware-token key and certificate information, and use configurable signing engines. The published configuration supports either SQLite or MySQL, while installation is available through npm or Docker. This gives teams a self-hosted deployment path with a focused feature set for connecting automated workflows to protected signing hardware.

Signo uses an open-source model rather than a tiered SaaS plan, so its appeal is strongest for teams prepared to operate the service themselves. It is a practical fit when Linux hosting, API access, HMAC authentication, PKCS#11 token management, and Authenticode signing cover the requirement. Teams seeking broader target coverage, a managed service, or a wider platform ecosystem should choose a product designed around those needs instead. Signo is most compelling when control over deployment and hardware-backed signing matter more than breadth.

Signo pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Signs files and Windows executables through an HTTP API
    • Supports PKCS#11 token detection, management, and visibility
    • Handles multiple users, API signees, and CI/CD signing workflows
  • Where it doesn't
    • Runs on Linux rather than offering broad platform coverage
    • Requires self-hosting and operational ownership
    • Signing support is focused on files and Windows executables

Signo fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update