Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

SecuDAST review

#25 of 26 in Dynamic Application Security Testing Software

A self-hosted DAST option for authenticated, API, SPA, and CI-focused testing.

6.5/10Editor score
SecuDAST6.5 Visit SecuNexa

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

SecuDAST is a dynamic application security testing product for staging, pre-production, internal, and other running applications. It operates inside the customer’s network, including environments that are not internet reachable. The product is aimed at self-hosted teams that need authenticated-flow scanning, API testing, single-page application coverage, and CI-oriented execution without moving targets outside their environment.

Its strongest area is the combination of coverage and evidence. SecuDAST supports scoped, repeatable scan profiles and safe-mode probing with rate limiting, helping teams define how scans run against particular applications. Findings include the request and response that demonstrated the issue, giving security and engineering teams concrete material for review. Standard report formats can feed CI/CD pipelines and ticketing systems, while findings can also be sent to the SecuNexa dashboard. This makes the product a practical fit for teams that want repeatable checks connected to existing delivery and remediation workflows.

Deployment and commercial fit deserve close attention. The published model is contact sales, and the verified deployment option is self-hosted, so organizations should be prepared to run the product within their own network rather than adopt a hosted service. SecuDAST’s stated coverage includes dynamic frontends and single-page applications, but does not establish browser-engine scanning or execution of browser-side behavior. Teams prioritizing network-contained testing, APIs, authenticated flows, and pipeline reporting should consider SecuDAST. Teams that require a managed platform or explicitly need browser-based behavior testing should choose a product that provides those capabilities.

SecuDAST pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Tests authenticated flows, APIs, SPAs, and running web applications
    • Captures request-and-response evidence for each finding
    • Supports scoped profiles, safe probing, and CI-oriented execution
  • Where it doesn't
    • Self-hosted deployment requires operation inside the customer network
    • Pricing is handled through contact sales
    • Browser-side behavior execution is not part of the stated coverage

SecuDAST fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update