Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Scriban review

Free#19 of 65 in Template Engine Software

A .NET template engine with async rendering and controlled runtime access.

7.7/10Editor score
Scriban7.7 Visit Scriban

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Scriban is an open-source .NET text-templating engine and scripting language for developers building applications that generate text or markup. It fits teams that need programmable templates, Liquid compatibility, asynchronous rendering, and control over which objects, members, and functions are exposed during execution. The project is maintained by Alexandre Mutel, distributed as a NuGet package, and available for Windows, Linux, and macOS through self-hosted deployment.

Its standout capability is the configurable runtime context. Developers can set execution limits, define custom functions, integrate .NET objects, and work with a visitable abstract syntax tree that supports AST-to-text formatting. The engine also includes array, date, HTML, math, object, regex, string, and timespan functions. Template.RenderAsync provides asynchronous rendering, while compatibility with Liquid syntax can ease adoption of existing template styles. These features make Scriban suitable for applications that need more control than a basic text substitution library.

Scriban is free and open source under the BSD-2-Clause license, so the published model does not add paid feature tiers. Its runtime controls regulate exposure and execution, but the documentation states that they are not a process-level sandbox or a security boundary around arbitrary .NET objects. Rendering occurs inside the host application, and deployment is self-managed. Teams seeking a .NET-native engine with async support and deliberate runtime restrictions should consider Scriban; projects requiring a process-isolated security boundary, managed hosting, or a broader support operation should look for an alternative.

Scriban pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Async rendering through Template.RenderAsync
    • Runtime limits and access controls for objects, members, and functions
    • Scriban and Liquid-compatible syntax with .NET integration
  • Where it doesn't
    • Runtime controls are not a process-level sandbox or security boundary
    • Self-hosted deployment places hosting responsibility on your team
    • No AI features and documentation is the listed support channel

Scriban fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update