RoosterJS

At a glance

• Editor score
  6.7 / 10
• Pricing
  Free plan
• Best for
  Microsoft-oriented web editing workflows
• Free plan
  Yes
• Paid from
  Free
• Deployment
  Self_hosted
• Facts checked
  21 Sep 2026

• Where it wins

  • Structured Content Model supports DOM conversion and editor APIs
  • Broad paste handling for Word, Excel, OneNote, and PowerPoint
  • Tables, images, plugins, Markdown, and editing utilities in one library

• Where it doesn't

  • Requires embedding and implementation within your own web application
  • Its listed feature set centers on content editing rather than collaboration
  • Self-hosted deployment leaves application teams responsible for operations

Our verdict on RoosterJS

RoosterJS is an open-source, framework-independent JavaScript rich text editor for developers building web editing experiences. It runs inside an HTML div and uses a Content Model between the DOM and editor APIs, converting structured content to HTML for display. The library is suited to applications that need control over editor behavior, structured content, tables, images, formatting, and Microsoft-oriented paste handling rather than a hosted editor service.

Its strongest differentiator is the breadth of content handling around Microsoft formats. Paste support covers Word, Excel, Word Online, OneNote Online, and PowerPoint, while the editor also provides table insertion and editing, image selection and formatting, alt-text APIs, hyperlinks, lists, headings, block quotes, undo, redo, find-and-replace, keyboard shortcuts, and dark-mode utilities. Markdown conversion is available through an extension package. This makes RoosterJS a practical fit for teams that need to preserve and manage varied office-originated content inside a browser-based editor.

RoosterJS is distributed as a library installed through npm or Yarn, with a plugin architecture, built-in plugins, modular content-model packages, and API overrides for customization. That flexibility suits teams with JavaScript or TypeScript development capacity and an existing web application into which the editor can be embedded. It is less suitable for buyers seeking a hosted service, a ready-made collaboration workspace, or a product with application-level operations handled outside their team. Choose RoosterJS when implementation control and Microsoft paste compatibility matter most; consider another editor when collaboration or a managed service is central.

Your product? Our editors can test RoosterJS in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →

RoosterJS pricing

RoosterJS fact sheet

Alternatives to RoosterJS

• CKEditor 5A structured editor framework with collaboration, media, export, and flexible deployment.9.3
• TinyMCEA flexible editor with broad framework support, structured HTML, and multiple deployment options.8.8
• TiptapA flexible editor foundation for teams building structured, collaborative web applications.8.7

See all RoosterJS alternatives →

Featured on iTechGuides

RoosterJS is listed in our Rich Text Editor Software directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.

<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/roosterjs/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/roosterjs.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update