Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

RoosterJS review

Free#18 of 37 in Rich Text Editor Software

A flexible, open-source editor for structured web content and Microsoft-format paste handling.

6.7/10Editor score
RoosterJS6.7 Visit RoosterJS

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

RoosterJS is an open-source, framework-independent JavaScript rich text editor for developers building web editing experiences. It runs inside an HTML div and uses a Content Model between the DOM and editor APIs, converting structured content to HTML for display. The library is suited to applications that need control over editor behavior, structured content, tables, images, formatting, and Microsoft-oriented paste handling rather than a hosted editor service.

Its strongest differentiator is the breadth of content handling around Microsoft formats. Paste support covers Word, Excel, Word Online, OneNote Online, and PowerPoint, while the editor also provides table insertion and editing, image selection and formatting, alt-text APIs, hyperlinks, lists, headings, block quotes, undo, redo, find-and-replace, keyboard shortcuts, and dark-mode utilities. Markdown conversion is available through an extension package. This makes RoosterJS a practical fit for teams that need to preserve and manage varied office-originated content inside a browser-based editor.

RoosterJS is distributed as a library installed through npm or Yarn, with a plugin architecture, built-in plugins, modular content-model packages, and API overrides for customization. That flexibility suits teams with JavaScript or TypeScript development capacity and an existing web application into which the editor can be embedded. It is less suitable for buyers seeking a hosted service, a ready-made collaboration workspace, or a product with application-level operations handled outside their team. Choose RoosterJS when implementation control and Microsoft paste compatibility matter most; consider another editor when collaboration or a managed service is central.

RoosterJS pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Structured Content Model supports DOM conversion and editor APIs
    • Broad paste handling for Word, Excel, OneNote, and PowerPoint
    • Tables, images, plugins, Markdown, and editing utilities in one library
  • Where it doesn't
    • Requires embedding and implementation within your own web application
    • Its listed feature set centers on content editing rather than collaboration
    • Self-hosted deployment leaves application teams responsible for operations

RoosterJS fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update