Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Rogue review

Freemium#15 of 27 in AI Red Teaming Tools

A focused choice for automated, CI/CD-oriented testing of AI agents.

7.8/10Editor score
Rogue7.8 Visit Rogue

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Rogue is a self-hosted platform for evaluating and red-teaming AI agents. It is designed for teams that need automated checks against business policies, expected behaviors, and security vulnerabilities, particularly within CI/CD workflows. The product targets A2A, MCP, and Python agents, with integrations for OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. Its focus is narrower than a general AI operations suite: Rogue concentrates on evaluation, adversarial testing, risk scoring, and reporting.

Its testing workflow covers basic, full, and custom scans, with attack categories including encoding, social engineering, injection, semantic, and technical attacks. Rogue can generate dynamic scenarios from business context, monitor agent conversations during evaluation, and assign CVSS-based risk scores. Reproducible scans using random seeds support repeatable assessment, while the command-line interface is oriented toward CI/CD use. Teams can export results in Markdown, CSV, and JSON, making the output suitable for review and downstream reporting.

The published offering includes a free option for personal and internal use, while commercial hosting requires licensing. The pricing model is contact sales rather than a set of public recurring tiers. Deployment is self-hosted, with an API and a terminal interface, so teams should account for operational ownership around their own environment. Rogue is a strong fit for organizations that want automated agent scans, policy evaluation, monitoring, and reproducible reports in development pipelines. Teams seeking vendor-hosted commercial deployment, broader application security coverage, or a simple no-infrastructure workflow should consider alternatives.

Rogue pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Automated policy evaluation and adversarial red-team scans
    • Supports A2A, MCP, and Python agents
    • Reproducible runs with CVSS scoring and exportable reports
  • Where it doesn't
    • Commercial hosting requires licensing
    • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure management
    • Paid pricing requires contacting sales

Rogue fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update